Re: ietf.org unaccessible for Tor users

Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> Tue, 15 March 2016 11:34 UTC

Return-Path: <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF4CD12D547 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 04:34:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QdEHceWcU3Rj for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 04:34:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p130.piuha.net (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2a00:1d50:2::130]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B49212D56A for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 04:34:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5638C2CCE2; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 13:34:27 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from jari.arkko@piuha.net)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at piuha.net
Received: from p130.piuha.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (p130.piuha.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id y_bplPOxXxcC; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 13:34:26 +0200 (EET)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2a00:1d50:2::130]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D0952CC9A; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 13:34:26 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from jari.arkko@piuha.net)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
Subject: Re: ietf.org unaccessible for Tor users
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
In-Reply-To: <CAF84FB2-A370-4093-A4D0-59E078E6D299@fb.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 11:34:24 +0000
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <636CF940-8A8F-4CFD-917E-EBF1FD32CD70@piuha.net>
References: <20160313143521.GC26841@Hirasawa> <m2a8m0y72q.wl%randy@psg.com> <F04B3B85-6B14-43BA-9A21-FC0A31E79065@piuha.net> <56E7E09D.7040100@cisco.com> <CAF84FB2-A370-4093-A4D0-59E078E6D299@fb.com>
To: Alec Muffett <alecm@fb.com>, Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/WDcna4hgofRMyOdo9-VC8n5b2gw>
Cc: IETF Disgust List <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 11:34:31 -0000

Folks,

When I said that access via Tor is important it was in the context of it being just another way to access Internet, kind of like different types of access networks or browsers. Didn’t want to attach any particular meaning to Tor or anything else. In positive or negative sense. Of course we want to maximise the ability of people to access IETF content, at least if it gets major usage.

However, I do want to make an argument that denial of service attacks are a fact of life. I know we don’t have foolproof solutions for them, but we have some practical means to deal with some of the effects, unfortunately somethings affecting proper usage as well. But I do think we need the ability for our network managers (or the ones that we delegate this to) deal with attacks using means that are necessary. Perhaps those means can be improved, but there will need to be some means.

Jari