Re: How survey results informed preliminary IETF 108 planning
tom petch <daedulus@btconnect.com> Fri, 22 May 2020 09:31 UTC
Return-Path: <daedulus@btconnect.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D6973A093C for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 May 2020 02:31:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=btconnect.onmicrosoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3vhow07aTN6s for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 May 2020 02:31:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from EUR01-VE1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-eopbgr140135.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.14.135]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1FFDC3A095F for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 22 May 2020 02:31:39 -0700 (PDT)
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=GfPztF+lppdEOCCE63bnGiiLAN3e5ZwarzjZDvcAOG1aPf7jBbgLtuM9SdfCqXMXyqcaUo9nDJ9e9qprw5Uv+EbD6Hwxiima0r0ckkmhxcWci2lr/o5Qknlrh2WwN46OxmIiKxYvUzoB96EdFsqH3CCQWboEYtNIjIXPDeZW7EhA/V7lr4+9WCDZIVEM2N0Nd3XDL+myhpEgIPT6zgyKDYbU+H17qVNAyKq5WPqL/BuRydAtx6p8fXU+phYXybWBcRekMneH2sz8/kJEj744MjrY034YZHqjig8f4Xo+8NDUGZ5YPBlgRmyiIx76lHeDSkQHLGpr6M/folvDZ8hGfA==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=OiACjYJzvGdOODbx+bWcFAtP1h25WBRFm41L9bVNBxk=; b=mjK8l4ROOS0QP1Z+zLKei7T/0V0Ij7qkKBXRm+OS1fax/c2h5AL3BwNEPYN+c56TH08DFf2V/SKhq6xRtUsr2bdu1X7dHbZZqNfQveLdts9d8kMMsNhn+eBm+tLcDlQk+9rJzDCJqE4Dj1r76XILy58JruqKDeIIOXcW2o0wiuJjwa+QWmdPLe/CtsO9vaN4ug3rMlpB4bqdIIIc+s4jUnTgl76L8dcqcNQfbJK8X++fJj9fM8GupIuMnSKbXPN6nLurcup7XGg+CxtaByRT8PtFbdtpVTNZ9O1Bz8FHlNAn2L1C7KS+8AV0MxHlrY16CjbL7QS/l9tNcHKUt+rvOA==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=btconnect.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=btconnect.com; dkim=pass header.d=btconnect.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btconnect.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-btconnect-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=OiACjYJzvGdOODbx+bWcFAtP1h25WBRFm41L9bVNBxk=; b=G9hAEjJt1fUAWcEOUyocokUWglW8okOgybwktjbHXgJv5tdno9lRbLkjPoOCI8E32UcbIVBOOu+o9Kvk0anYZPhHMXG38ktU9meEpFrI3/Cg4i0JeXDU2WMjXyfkS53ESAhrK5Kg6O0L4rlHDlhz5JW8BZ/ftVC2M594f6cKQHM=
Authentication-Results: ietf.org; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;ietf.org; dmarc=none action=none header.from=btconnect.com;
Received: from VI1PR0701MB2480.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (2603:10a6:800:63::16) by VI1PR0701MB6864.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (2603:10a6:800:198::21) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3045.8; Fri, 22 May 2020 09:31:37 +0000
Received: from VI1PR0701MB2480.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::3474:b82e:e75a:b176]) by VI1PR0701MB2480.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::3474:b82e:e75a:b176%11]) with mapi id 15.20.3021.019; Fri, 22 May 2020 09:31:37 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
References: <7636CAB0-662E-4CC8-8004-68390C157B91@ietf.org>
Date: Fri, 22 May 2020 10:31:28 +0100
Message-ID: <1UW9WDm4Ib.1CNNASkAWXO@pc8xp>
In-Reply-To: <7636CAB0-662E-4CC8-8004-68390C157B91@ietf.org>
From: tom petch <daedulus@btconnect.com>
To: IETF <ietf@ietf.org>, IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: How survey results informed preliminary IETF 108 planning
User-Agent: OEClassic/3.0 (WinXP.2600; F; 2019-11-28)
X-ClientProxiedBy: LO2P265CA0183.GBRP265.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (2603:10a6:600:a::27) To VI1PR0701MB2480.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (2603:10a6:800:63::16)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-MessageSentRepresentingType: 1
Received: from pc8xp (81.131.229.108) by LO2P265CA0183.GBRP265.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (2603:10a6:600:a::27) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3021.24 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 22 May 2020 09:31:36 +0000
X-Originating-IP: [81.131.229.108]
X-MS-PublicTrafficType: Email
X-MS-Office365-Filtering-Correlation-Id: 05540cba-ef28-4f8e-f457-08d7fe32ec8b
X-MS-TrafficTypeDiagnostic: VI1PR0701MB6864:
X-Microsoft-Antispam-PRVS: <VI1PR0701MB68646ABD0F4A36F55D09F3A9C6B40@VI1PR0701MB6864.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
X-MS-Oob-TLC-OOBClassifiers: OLM:8273;
X-Forefront-PRVS: 04111BAC64
X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck: 1
X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0;
X-Microsoft-Antispam-Message-Info: fO4gL5yZ305RQMqYMkcO7j9HsgqvwAIlFJzXadKPjZUr4QiVs3LqYEtVZS2eEyS/Sf2shDrguacoY2eogRGGYuoLVK+PPuLBA9YgQrA0vxrinwACy13FhN6mzg2xIXil9zdgHKekR02OOhp8ZhRSlMg9lrRJpD+THf0e4es9+nKMRSbQZdOiJ8EYulVZv0x2YiIzx7OrUpUEnJCPtSmu8h14ikTm9xxvZliQzNSKXkq4pKIou1uG2BpakLdouv8hfFVBAxzvD1sw2sxgnh7o/Fh13e6quKZCMFo6wxZoiIIzpKh7GcjMRjDi55WR7tcyfV+cEynt48SbfF8ZJ5TphG5H6OGf4s4YQVZjOrmRasnei9T4iISTGiL0X8J1nOg8RRiIH7URMbIIiJLeh+2EKw==
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:VI1PR0701MB2480.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFTY:; SFS:(376002)(346002)(396003)(136003)(39860400002)(366004)(53546011)(9686003)(55016002)(8936002)(956004)(8676002)(2906002)(9576002)(66476007)(66556008)(66946007)(478600001)(186003)(966005)(316002)(110136005)(26005)(52116002)(52230400001)(45080400002)(6496006)(6666004)(86362001)(33716001)(5660300002)(16526019); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102;
X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData: dQb7jU5s8C2azvwv77Tn+Zay6ZQ1iBWzY8xjTPI+3Wl7XRuPyj+N790NVydWm9HJr8OVzNdjb4M/8NTyUw806kH65ksdSHdf8nq7uhsZ02ZzrjxM+HE1rnk5TOoz12hFmu6H2WYKQ6FPkZqUgPGbRnOBAXo4vZM5WGcvevV65MPgRaVqM1Sv/C9mzN0k8TFr+ImrNWwn/TDxVHm00nBJg0j/RfBa3JWHjhBvY1YIu4vFrR7Ji3eqsrYvFoqUOD0aQYaUjuVMf5nYWGWEG6AJyrPvkWIlEftqk3wKL3FBMhidF8Z1UEpQI+8EHxVliFBDpC99omowbo++GYSIKU8/hQZEykQOlRxygGN9lhnQvW+p37LQWV36LgYlgwgMlmXGdPaIUX6qa4oHxYkeQKt8pmC+W02+t+hsbFiWNspbMPIl6OW32NgqE2IRPCqdLFbFhqo/w9o62T7y2QE89F0ljW7W3CxOKVbm6Q/t3yCvydFH5g4PEibGFgmI2opu8AaQ
X-OriginatorOrg: btconnect.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 05540cba-ef28-4f8e-f457-08d7fe32ec8b
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 May 2020 09:31:36.9018 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: cf8853ed-96e5-465b-9185-806bfe185e30
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-MailboxType: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-UserPrincipalName: fu9Ivxk7ku5rLUeqcbkR7jrPW1jyZ7R3LfxfboBB443jFUXCyGJvEhT0pk8d6eyJwfRIl3zQkHYo/Lmead6tnw==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: VI1PR0701MB6864
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/WKq2d1vjgilD3zk3-TdGehAKSDw>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 May 2020 09:31:43 -0000
Is there any mailiing list on which to raise issues arising from virtual meetings, apart from this one? I am thinking that this will go way beyond IETF 108 and so will be a long running discussion :-( --- New Outlook Express and Windows Live Mail replacement - get it here: https://www.oeclassic.com/ The sorts of thing I am wondering about is - fees (much asked about in the survey) - technology needed to participate (there seems to be a groundswell that there is no good technology, at least not open) - I-D cut off, or not - POP location (ie cost of connecting) - authentication and so on ----- Original Message ----- From: IETF Chair <chair@ietf.org> Reply-To: IETF <ietf@ietf.org> To: IETF <ietf@ietf.org> Sent: 21/05/2020 18:55:22 Subject: How survey results informed preliminary IETF 108 planning ________________________________________________________________________________ A new blog post is up at https://www.ietf.org/blog/ietf108-survey-results-informed-planning/ about how we’ve used survey results thus far to inform IETF 108 meeting planning. Alissa Cooper IETF Chair