IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: draft-klensin-iaoc-member-01 (was: Re: I-D Action: draft-hardie-iaoc-iab-update-00.txt)

Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> Thu, 18 February 2016 19:50 UTC

Return-Path: <randy@psg.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7BAA1B325F for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 11:50:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.906
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.906 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.006] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sV_sJr6hejBY for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 11:50:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ran.psg.com (ran.psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:8006::18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D61311B3458 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 11:50:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=ryuu.psg.com) by ran.psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <randy@psg.com>) id 1aWUb1-0001eq-VE; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 19:50:40 +0000
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2016 08:50:39 +1300
Message-ID: <m27fi13ii8.wl%randy@psg.com>
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
Subject: Re: draft-klensin-iaoc-member-01 (was: Re: I-D Action: draft-hardie-iaoc-iab-update-00.txt)
In-Reply-To: <20160218144138.GB100@mx2.yitter.info>
References: <99085F2E3228C28C99AB062A@JcK-HP8200.jck.com> <56C267D8.5010505@gmail.com> <56C28F22.1000705@comcast.net> <20160218025414.GM66257@mx2.yitter.info> <56C556A5.8090202@comcast.net> <20160218144138.GB100@mx2.yitter.info>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/22.3 Mule/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/WN8RCDS8h4rbBhV9b0SP525DtaI>
Cc: IETF Disgust List <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 19:50:48 -0000

> My experience of the IETF suggests that we are better off with more
> social conventions and fewer formal rules

yessssssssssss!

lawyer envy wraps us around so many axles, this being a case in point.

randy

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email