Re: Planned experiment: A new mailing list for last-call discussions

S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> Sat, 14 September 2019 17:41 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@elandsys.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D41E1200B1 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 14 Sep 2019 10:41:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.698
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.698 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=elandsys.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kEdOtqWnybCY for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 14 Sep 2019 10:41:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.elandsys.com (mx.elandsys.com [162.213.2.210]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4158C12001E for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 14 Sep 2019 10:41:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from DESKTOP-K6V9C2L.elandsys.com ([102.115.188.180]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.15.2/8.14.5) with ESMTPSA id x8EHed7D002527 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 14 Sep 2019 10:40:48 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1568482852; x=1568569252; i=@elandsys.com; bh=YHTL8yC/BBPEjRMldjhehrtZ0GLBEWHn9k5Oe/AiWxA=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=3DWl3KOz16kSwRo/3lj5P7H9HZy7vOwHMvCN+M5o5uQ66A55SpQJ1YzfRGzbXWQP2 X0I+o/H7HGg/K6A/sKsy/Wz1eRobUeblVy1EmiSLNI/0FTiCLiJ367iJ6t+HPbhQXX os0ciCMqvyrv5ojkVJRA5GMeqPZ0Stp6niMOJkC0=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20190914100129.0cc39fe0@elandnews.com>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2019 10:40:16 -0700
To: Pete Resnick <resnick@episteme.net>, ietf@ietf.org
From: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
Subject: Re: Planned experiment: A new mailing list for last-call discussions
Cc: "Barry Leiba" <barryleiba@computer.org>, ietf@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <91194B51-317E-42C8-8C79-4FD48768B09A@episteme.net>
References: <6.2.5.6.2.20190913131837.0bfc7720@elandsys.com> <91194B51-317E-42C8-8C79-4FD48768B09A@episteme.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/WNjQfQUfKPIKFeA6TqsBL7kpT6I>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2019 17:41:04 -0000

Hi Pete,
At 09:55 AM 14-09-2019, Pete Resnick wrote:
>SM, I think you misunderstood the point of the new list. It's not 
>for Last Call announcements; it's for Last Call discussion (i.e., 
>individual Last Call comments, area review team reviews, and all of 
>their respective replies). Those messages number 50 to 100 per 
>month. Moving those messages to a separate list is the experiment.

Sorry for not being clear.  The comment about announcements was about 
the ones which are usually sent to ietf@, e.g.
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/f7jzS-V6D4xIgXsGFELx1zx0Kn4
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/7q7vwduyP5JeLqm--YviPU-4uto

For what it worth, those messages do not generate that many 
responses.  I understood [1] that the experiment was about moving 
those messages to a new mailing list.

Regards,
S. Moonesamy

1. That does not mean that the clarification which you provided is not helpful.