Re: Planned experiment: A new mailing list for last-call discussions

S Moonesamy <> Sat, 14 September 2019 17:41 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D41E1200B1 for <>; Sat, 14 Sep 2019 10:41:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.698
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.698 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)"
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kEdOtqWnybCY for <>; Sat, 14 Sep 2019 10:41:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4158C12001E for <>; Sat, 14 Sep 2019 10:41:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ([]) (authenticated bits=0) by (8.15.2/8.14.5) with ESMTPSA id x8EHed7D002527 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 14 Sep 2019 10:40:48 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple;; s=mail; t=1568482852; x=1568569252;; bh=YHTL8yC/BBPEjRMldjhehrtZ0GLBEWHn9k5Oe/AiWxA=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=3DWl3KOz16kSwRo/3lj5P7H9HZy7vOwHMvCN+M5o5uQ66A55SpQJ1YzfRGzbXWQP2 X0I+o/H7HGg/K6A/sKsy/Wz1eRobUeblVy1EmiSLNI/0FTiCLiJ367iJ6t+HPbhQXX os0ciCMqvyrv5ojkVJRA5GMeqPZ0Stp6niMOJkC0=
Message-Id: <>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version
Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2019 10:40:16 -0700
To: Pete Resnick <>,
From: S Moonesamy <>
Subject: Re: Planned experiment: A new mailing list for last-call discussions
Cc: "Barry Leiba" <>,
In-Reply-To: <>
References: <> <>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2019 17:41:04 -0000

Hi Pete,
At 09:55 AM 14-09-2019, Pete Resnick wrote:
>SM, I think you misunderstood the point of the new list. It's not 
>for Last Call announcements; it's for Last Call discussion (i.e., 
>individual Last Call comments, area review team reviews, and all of 
>their respective replies). Those messages number 50 to 100 per 
>month. Moving those messages to a separate list is the experiment.

Sorry for not being clear.  The comment about announcements was about 
the ones which are usually sent to ietf@, e.g.

For what it worth, those messages do not generate that many 
responses.  I understood [1] that the experiment was about moving 
those messages to a new mailing list.

S. Moonesamy

1. That does not mean that the clarification which you provided is not helpful.