IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Wed, 14 April 2021 17:52 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 684BE3A195F for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Apr 2021 10:52:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dRFeNvK4y0J7 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Apr 2021 10:52:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com (mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com [IPv6:2620:100:9005:57f::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0C3BD3A1964 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Apr 2021 10:52:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0122331.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.43/8.16.0.43) with SMTP id 13EHoNdE001581; Wed, 14 Apr 2021 18:52:05 +0100
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; h=from : to : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : mime-version; s=jan2016.eng; bh=WcYwMYulVQZUS7nAMXNBG6cRSzbsushZ9GkhAEZVC2c=; b=OCO86J453uaSg0ZF015V313+8Jc9MWOnx0CnpCQKGA7s+7SVPB2CebogAfOAH+uQz+28 G+r6PsphvS+cDw+aQAmmQ2hpw1GG4rpp2Qm1J1suTF1MLEuNui0Ojd+4emxVkCcg2YsH wdAYCJdicUFxBsV4uIk5NF2yuz1K+YyM9XMfkHM0xnB3lcc+TG360NvW8at7psPEzBI8 HUH+tBY0AXB1Qd8Xm7pUnpTCW62hkXQhlY+nAEnbQoUlh3gTjcwIxXRuW+gi3ng9svRb CdToKOSroURoFVjg/r3Qam4AH9F+JXQoGKEJgCMLP2XWFQVwV82UtuLZSpnT4W8AZgmE 4Q==
Received: from prod-mail-ppoint1 (prod-mail-ppoint1.akamai.com [184.51.33.18] (may be forged)) by mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 37wayc217d-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 14 Apr 2021 18:52:05 +0100
Received: from pps.filterd (prod-mail-ppoint1.akamai.com [127.0.0.1]) by prod-mail-ppoint1.akamai.com (8.16.0.43/8.16.0.43) with SMTP id 13EHnvpB028816; Wed, 14 Apr 2021 13:52:04 -0400
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.32]) by prod-mail-ppoint1.akamai.com with ESMTP id 37wx1ds0rk-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 14 Apr 2021 13:52:04 -0400
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.101) by usma1ex-dag1mb4.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.104) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Wed, 14 Apr 2021 13:52:03 -0400
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.101]) by usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.101]) with mapi id 15.00.1497.012; Wed, 14 Apr 2021 13:52:03 -0400
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: Bron Gondwana <brong@fastmailteam.com>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
Thread-Topic: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
Thread-Index: AQHXMVCvDpStc2xvY0yrYzyLOyPATaq0Sx0A
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2021 17:52:02 +0000
Message-ID: <6FE260FD-09D0-4816-8CD1-8EDFF4644D52@akamai.com>
References: <20210413200535.BF29C72D2919@ary.qy> <7ac5ecf5-734e-7f63-a000-dea09cec1d0a@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> <5198680E-3555-48FF-9FF5-77105DBC06D7@akamai.com> <52e31d01-c5cf-489f-aa9c-cea327ef03d5@dogfood.fastmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <52e31d01-c5cf-489f-aa9c-cea327ef03d5@dogfood.fastmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/16.48.21041102
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [172.27.164.43]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_6FE260FD09D048168CD18EDFF4644D52akamaicom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.391, 18.0.761 definitions=2021-04-14_10:2021-04-14, 2021-04-14 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 bulkscore=0 phishscore=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=0 mlxlogscore=896 mlxscore=0 adultscore=0 malwarescore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2104060000 definitions=main-2104140117
X-Proofpoint-GUID: 2SfkWD2HLpyZFtmNINsYrhnySiV1vWN9
X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: 2SfkWD2HLpyZFtmNINsYrhnySiV1vWN9
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.391, 18.0.761 definitions=2021-04-14_10:2021-04-14, 2021-04-14 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 malwarescore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1011 lowpriorityscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 mlxlogscore=830 suspectscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxscore=0 phishscore=0 priorityscore=1501 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2104060000 definitions=main-2104140117
X-Agari-Authentication-Results: mx.akamai.com; spf=${SPFResult} (sender IP is 184.51.33.18) smtp.mailfrom=rsalz@akamai.com smtp.helo=prod-mail-ppoint1
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/WNuVbAS060hk-A2KkABw_4f88jE>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2021 17:52:13 -0000

> but I don't see the opposite case - the fact that even among readers of a single newspaper there is clear disagreement would seem a pretty strong argument for there not being broad consensus.

The NYTimes readership in particular, is not representative of the United States. They would be the first to admit it.

                /r$, by the way: long time subscriber

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email