Re: Describing which behavior is appropriate or not (was: Last Call: <draft-eggert-bcp45bis-06.txt> (IETF Discussion List Charter) to Best Current Practice)

Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com> Sun, 31 October 2021 00:34 UTC

Return-Path: <moore@network-heretics.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C6F73A1568 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 30 Oct 2021 17:34:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.248
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.248 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-3.33, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Tz8II9Z4vQ-f for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 30 Oct 2021 17:34:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com (out2-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DEF643A1565 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 30 Oct 2021 17:34:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id B02F65C00BE for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 30 Oct 2021 20:34:08 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Sat, 30 Oct 2021 20:34:08 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=9aXV+fZgLzPAEgiyb26upuSoYCmO3FyeQ3eP/qrR3 CA=; b=ckznxYhJHtzpxLkWT2YSQtP2LR1KMFP0GdVnMZ/qGVceFZtOeht/vrKpF TX983+m4EK+m8TIat8N5Zah08sf+LwRf8LMDPHt0bwUINAp3STtxLhMOCNrcrRuW zl4BmQJhnUj+9yUtrHz6wZ56nM/RVYkLKJjKTBPlnYDLMx/lBlsrgUYy4tf4cIir VExT5JPDJYP7jzkQd9o7h9A694+rIFC1W5+gws8mihzr8uc5fN4GlXBGGvwikobX huqi8LoTe/SMSeNAgfTb6PlpOkQQSlXZPh8OAN8fnZ7B5eh4FRiA0Zznp14nnIlA jS2eNvOvwFycoEpiQ7/kRthwcq/6g==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:gOR9YTMa-BKiYOuhwXul7tbXYtDbN0Hi_DpPVrN9UseszLgT4fIDCg> <xme:gOR9Yd8VJ6SClsXXB_fkoB3pWQlMmK3hN9X5Pro5E_ojxsjIvMg0rXZz71L13raxT xbEgPIemasBSw>
X-ME-Received: <xmr:gOR9YSQCP4V9lY3QLuMUADjFzDKxDiUuNQ0zHzIZksDSxP3Av8HO5pnjcdp_bjqeaVHJaw9-3mj1cSMY3zeVtW0rJnc584_Rfk8F6QS6sjazLv2HuBZUJw>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvtddrvdegkedgfeehucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpefuvfhfhffkffgfgggjtgfgsehtke ertddtfeejnecuhfhrohhmpefmvghithhhucfoohhorhgvuceomhhoohhrvgesnhgvthif ohhrkhdqhhgvrhgvthhitghsrdgtohhmqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeekleefgefgje eihedvvedvgfffheehvdeftdejueejiedvtddtkeevvdehheejieenucffohhmrghinhep shhouhhrtggvfhhorhhgvgdrnhgvthenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrh grmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehmohhorhgvsehnvghtfihorhhkqdhhvghrvghtihgtshdr tghomh
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:gOR9YXut080aeBAffRq0nti0TQYB3ApLGxB02ijiSyWe1fP-vh2aPg> <xmx:gOR9YbcjpaQKFsXW02vLL6ZqdgsLxymsMLp5AaC1TQbpkDgknuK6aQ> <xmx:gOR9YT07AZhqm2fK3nGDIoyP7X6IqctVoyDX6pSAhB3tvlkba8gdzQ> <xmx:gOR9YVp48IwPglhAI8cpb5tTNEv27dajtw9m_eDLcnnYBw5oXkB01g>
Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 30 Oct 2021 20:34:08 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: Re: Describing which behavior is appropriate or not (was: Last Call: <draft-eggert-bcp45bis-06.txt> (IETF Discussion List Charter) to Best Current Practice)
To: ietf@ietf.org
References: <47db1859-8201-9f37-0efd-aa09f4b1379b@network-heretics.com> <98F25285-BD71-49BB-9B7E-CEFF217183F7@yahoo.co.uk>
From: Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com>
Message-ID: <faa808cd-ad75-f643-7f44-62af5f0dbab3@network-heretics.com>
Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2021 20:34:07 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.13.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <98F25285-BD71-49BB-9B7E-CEFF217183F7@yahoo.co.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/WaIIPAkl8RGZpZmQ9u6o1StkkOE>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2021 00:34:14 -0000

> Absolutely. That's why I threw together
>
> http://lloydwood.users.sourceforge.net/Personal/L.Wood/publications/internet-drafts/README.html 
> <http://lloydwood.users.sourceforge.net/Personal/L.Wood/publications/internet-drafts/README.html>
>
> in my defence, because every so often I get asked to justify my worth 
> and existence to some random corporate apparatchik of some random 
> company who has decided that he (and it's always a he. women just 
> don't do that whole  'you must justify your right to exist to me' 
> thing) dislikes my participation in an IETF mailing list.

And that's why it's important to reinforce the idea that IETF 
participants are NOT representatives of their employers, but at most 
"sponsored" by them (or in many cases they pay their own way), and IETF 
participants are expected to use their own best technical judgment about 
what's good for the Internet as a whole.

Keith