Re: [arch-d] Call for Comment: <draft-iab-rfc3677bis> (IETF ISOC Board of Trustee Appointment Procedures)

Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> Sat, 27 February 2016 20:35 UTC

Return-Path: <barryleiba.mailing.lists@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFC751AD0CA; Sat, 27 Feb 2016 12:35:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.278
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.278 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AF4FY0WjrDwU; Sat, 27 Feb 2016 12:35:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-io0-x232.google.com (mail-io0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E943B1AD0C0; Sat, 27 Feb 2016 12:35:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-io0-x232.google.com with SMTP id l127so152792280iof.3; Sat, 27 Feb 2016 12:35:49 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc; bh=8xZhVARkDfMkkzdrl1u2TJ5KV5l4v2+PTnebi1l+HkE=; b=p5cRhVQJF71pLC7DKR04zc+h2Z5ehb1CnniHi8LidbpkNqBRWAmnytkkAtaUToln/h aNsFZS/N30Fi1IHE09axyohOrJiHckh+IPf2e6FttMVPN+lmChiEOSsGnOYsEwqEA+TG qfKA0dUGPfEIiYUpn5itRP8YnGKRLvUQ3dhnfCcIpnbj0g3VbLGwyJn/+mibaqehkQVm lxWCYiEJ9xNQascjBouOG5e+sqHnPicbnKQ274HGAvM/Mfzc2ZI3bk+fByde9CZFOzpQ xwxx/ZlodkoIzaIBCUiCZHDNTxhxDL2+1Gs1QV3h/Adzq0hu4D+GzaawkGmlpzekcoMO V3GQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc; bh=8xZhVARkDfMkkzdrl1u2TJ5KV5l4v2+PTnebi1l+HkE=; b=dJrXUMlOU1HQkcJrgJa3Jfo0Zt2T2289eTXP0aBrsXogfOWKvvQzQbxcU7vWegWL7F 2GgQ14d04P4ulK1yzVLmxLEJ7WrYrq3sYEsZ7j1Wh2178nJEDhN46aTlm8Hj1PkQdp44 uTC9ClxQS0xAQbuO0pYrbMzqj+Om/694ocZYNH8s+iADOh32hqycVAZssdLgj2s80bW5 Siv0zdMpfLldFW4mmJFdsHYGIif/3bpbz0R6p7sXyp81K0g4PcL+isUZpImt4bRk/Hr+ w2coSF8PG1a+BckbaI6cKmTeQmhKBNBBU5pWrDPOZjXSWLk8pfRNI8GriJXFNXv5u+Y5 t4Sg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOSPMOP0dLoCrZrSTIWHovRqScE4tkLx6T3wlDkixtCx81KxP15m5wVzUbWHI53K35UOYYp9POs8eRQkPw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.107.5.149 with SMTP id 143mr16480431iof.129.1456605349333; Sat, 27 Feb 2016 12:35:49 -0800 (PST)
Sender: barryleiba.mailing.lists@gmail.com
Received: by 10.107.184.195 with HTTP; Sat, 27 Feb 2016 12:35:49 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <56D1FDD2.5030906@gmail.com>
References: <20160224175935.21103.69618.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAC4RtVDpMsFuSMHPvkT2vXngGJkNsWDqL-g1EipcCUNjqa2Ssg@mail.gmail.com> <56CDFF39.7000603@gmail.com> <4572E392-3E57-45C4-9CBF-86B3E2E0982A@cisco.com> <CALaySJJfyikA7o5CEiQvbjNF-d7EzUi-TTsTWnxo2yb_jBibag@mail.gmail.com> <56CE6E2B.6020903@gmail.com> <6CB3AE29-C0DD-45B3-858C-2C3A44106ED5@gmail.com> <56D1FDD2.5030906@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2016 12:35:49 -0800
X-Google-Sender-Auth: eb0G-prVgKcZS9J7BW1xJArlxfc
Message-ID: <CAC4RtVDvN8fF4ZAH3-2MA4h3FTbUd37NQsy484eoCXy5MBhoGA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [arch-d] Call for Comment: <draft-iab-rfc3677bis> (IETF ISOC Board of Trustee Appointment Procedures)
From: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/Wda73QSrlD-Ilvfc3yIdS1t1-Os>
Cc: IAB <iab@iab.org>, Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>, IETF <ietf@ietf.org>, "Joe Hildebrand \(jhildebr\)" <jhildebr@cisco.com>, "architecture-discuss@ietf.org" <architecture-discuss@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2016 20:35:51 -0000

> I agree with you. I didn't actually advocate the minimalist version;
> I just wanted to point out that we need a BCP in any case.
>
> So, I suggest something like this:
>
> OLD:
>    If ISOC further modifies [ISOC-By-Laws] concerning the number of IAB
>    appointments to the ISOC Board or the timing thereof, the IAB will
>    make reasonable modifications to the processes embodied in this
>    document, without requiring further modification to this document.
>    Such changes will be announced via an IAB statement.
>
> NEW:
>    If ISOC further modifies [ISOC-By-Laws] concerning the number of IETF
>    appointments to the ISOC Board or the timing thereof, the IAB may
>    make corresponding modifications to the frequency and the timing of
>    the processes embodied in this document, pending any modification to
>    this document. Such changes will be announced via an IAB statement.

I think a change such as that would be good.

Barry