Re: [arch-d] Call for Comment: <draft-iab-rfc3677bis> (IETF ISOC Board of Trustee Appointment Procedures)

[Barry Leiba <[e-mail]>]

> I agree with you. I didn't actually advocate the minimalist version;
> I just wanted to point out that we need a BCP in any case.
>
> So, I suggest something like this:
>
> OLD:
>    If ISOC further modifies [ISOC-By-Laws] concerning the number of IAB
>    appointments to the ISOC Board or the timing thereof, the IAB will
>    make reasonable modifications to the processes embodied in this
>    document, without requiring further modification to this document.
>    Such changes will be announced via an IAB statement.
>
> NEW:
>    If ISOC further modifies [ISOC-By-Laws] concerning the number of IETF
>    appointments to the ISOC Board or the timing thereof, the IAB may
>    make corresponding modifications to the frequency and the timing of
>    the processes embodied in this document, pending any modification to
>    this document. Such changes will be announced via an IAB statement.

I think a change such as that would be good.

Barry