Re: DNSSEC change on IETF web pages

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Thu, 26 February 2015 15:32 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A336D1A01F9 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 26 Feb 2015 07:32:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id G7s6pq4_42_A for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 26 Feb 2015 07:32:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from odin.smetech.net (x-bolt-wan.smeinc.net [209.135.219.146]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4DE61A0173 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 26 Feb 2015 07:32:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (unknown [209.135.209.5]) by odin.smetech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11E839A401E; Thu, 26 Feb 2015 10:32:44 -0500 (EST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at smetech.net
Received: from odin.smetech.net ([209.135.209.4]) by localhost (ronin.smeinc.net [209.135.209.5]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LNzIVR5PN5Hi; Thu, 26 Feb 2015 10:32:23 -0500 (EST)
Received: from [172.17.165.10] (unknown [12.227.206.50]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by odin.smetech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E96C69A404B; Thu, 26 Feb 2015 10:32:22 -0500 (EST)
Subject: Re: DNSSEC change on IETF web pages
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1085)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.10.1502260956570.28451@bofh.nohats.ca>
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2015 10:32:16 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <8F8BAC4D-473F-4B6E-8E2C-0B8F2B23E0A8@vigilsec.com>
References: <2D220E7B-EB70-4838-A02F-28B66B914BDB@ietf.org> <alpine.LFD.2.10.1502260956570.28451@bofh.nohats.ca>
To: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1085)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/WeWXSRXDDp8ULz7peGfLOgHwHhs>
Cc: IETF Discussion List <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2015 15:32:57 -0000

Paul:

>> We plan to keep the new arrangement on at
>> http://dnssec.ietf.org for a while before finally moving
>> to this arrangement on http://www.ietf.org. Testing the
>> new arrangement on dnssec.ietf.org would be
>> appreciated!
> 
> Can a TLSA record be added for dnssec.ietf.org ?

That is planned.  Let's make sure the zone signature is solid, and then take this step.

Russ