IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: A contribution to ongoing terminology work

Larry Masinter <LMM@acm.org> Sat, 03 April 2021 00:09 UTC

Return-Path: <masinter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B79C93A0FFD for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Apr 2021 17:09:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.499
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.499 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id B4NrU9qlXqkB for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Apr 2021 17:09:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pj1-x102d.google.com (mail-pj1-x102d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::102d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2B4603A0FFA for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 2 Apr 2021 17:09:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pj1-x102d.google.com with SMTP id ot17-20020a17090b3b51b0290109c9ac3c34so5221971pjb.4 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 02 Apr 2021 17:09:38 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:from:to:cc:references:in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:thread-index :content-language; bh=GQWg1JeoDJEdCvpMrz2HhcmDX0oWCwlc9HD4GcOMHC4=; b=dY8o26fVDS+EMqpACGpzx5zQNcpLsR8LrZfgfyzU1HyXqZ9090UgIAsFZ88U/MOB45 Sm3/uTp7NuEhxMftvLwJdmGh/RnSR6ymJLDZiNZr926t3SVK/4dBuaFiiIDpLZ6KjAf4 27cN9ihw1CVR5EF/lFdxiZlQzJHI362dkhaYd/ciBd5Av2HbCBZgdCLaSXociA63WU3N SFHdh/lqMmZqNbP0ccXzIwvZBSN18s1IEzpnju6gKM99F+993T3k7CuKB8c9+AhW9C2Q Qy4Y9DYunowxZIGahdPsxRA0v6WYTwmHl9I1pwjXRsbq+y5VHa3l+fgoh/L3K6FKweeq xesQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:from:to:cc:references:in-reply-to:subject :date:message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:thread-index :content-language; bh=GQWg1JeoDJEdCvpMrz2HhcmDX0oWCwlc9HD4GcOMHC4=; b=QOmK4jDovxkqfOZdg/vkHFbO/PHFlF4XEFs+PXNdqhUaXy3EqvyT0XS1OBaJhG8/Rg bqHRwosaOnvNb99A+iYuV6eYCeNYSwhrlmIi6DbJamSbTMmU/pwGr0kAFlkKJ9XU5HpZ ykcuyOXwsY5FFO8jQUGCmjGjFcu8FJ2qV5ONJaOF154FK86g6qF0lz2lGRt33nVbt7Z+ jXFpPOKrGEaN/Gr8Gdb/NjGB3xvCx1p41eLq+/7S6lqGJEDj/zAja9KKmJvdkWl4iluW GvferPI/rRePwBO2DoarwvLdh5ypKRoga60AbuE8+ytfx9q12RkAU1kvEMQ2uhbGYGJH wfPA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5308CA41KENLewTIWNsv2HytsDJztXTlMsk5/HoOjTyl3uIttrGn UuoncKPuRgHUzZEVMYhrjHc=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwkG4tUL7IXdmPY+qpt1oUQsnjTiLsJzDi17zoaC4QTeIRf5jxyTrcbzOgycvjpYQZsMbIx5A==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:14a:: with SMTP id em10mr16090452pjb.162.1617408576644; Fri, 02 Apr 2021 17:09:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from TVPC (c-73-158-116-21.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [73.158.116.21]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v1sm9037364pjt.1.2021.04.02.17.09.35 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 02 Apr 2021 17:09:35 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: Larry Masinter <masinter@gmail.com>
From: Larry Masinter <LMM@acm.org>
X-Google-Original-From: "Larry Masinter" <lmm@acm.org>
To: 'Sam Hartman' <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu>, 'Brian E Carpenter' <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Cc: 'Keith Moore' <moore@network-heretics.com>, ietf@ietf.org
References: <859352252.4167919.1617264911078.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <859352252.4167919.1617264911078@mail.yahoo.com> <85575541-C896-4530-B028-C0DF9BA3EA8B@ietf.org> <411426886.24320.1617306016731@appsuite-gw2.open-xchange.com> <20210401195735.GA3828@localhost> <20210402032059.GD79563@kduck.mit.edu> <1e4feea2-2c81-b31a-04e3-d4c9a4adbaf7@lounge.org> <20210402163230.GH79563@kduck.mit.edu> <4c82de79-1e40-2eed-909b-8a288284393d@lounge.org> <439a33c9-5791-4c90-76a3-54aab828a37d@network-heretics.com> <5C955F3B-2EE7-43DD-85BA-DA1C1CF353F1@tzi.org> <7b3ba302-ec36-eb8d-7461-861a0b6651ac@network-heretics.com> <0dca7a0d-d51e-4c67-cc96-a44de0141480@gmail.com> <9c369a34-d47c-3af0-9793-8342f5f6ec63@network-heretics.com> <c613095d-f0b4-8df7-e703-d1b3c52bffc5@gmail.com> <tslpmzctgoi.fsf@suchdamage.org>
In-Reply-To: <tslpmzctgoi.fsf@suchdamage.org>
Subject: RE: A contribution to ongoing terminology work
Date: Fri, 02 Apr 2021 17:09:35 -0700
Message-ID: <005701d7281d$a19ccf10$e4d66d30$@acm.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index: AQHEN2cJ849tr5nsZKZTDvlCG1EIKQGZ8ISZAHpoF0oCFdCnOQJYe1usAUplAd0CQkKH3AIrnWNBAX6K9iQBXWPs3gJC9fxDAWy6TxcBP0PCXQGvGVV4AqrYBkcBmQR91qn3/ILQ
Content-Language: en-us
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/WfuJd7UWgaL9QYQOE6WzoP4LFPc>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 03 Apr 2021 00:09:44 -0000

One way to assess intent is correlate with the amount of effort put into
finding other, less offensive methods of making a point.

That's the main argument for why it id ok to have rules that require
assessment of author's intent.

--
https://LarryMasinter.net https://interlisp.org

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email