Re: IETF Logo Wear

Philip Nesser <phil@nesser.com> Thu, 19 August 2010 16:32 UTC

Return-Path: <pjnesser@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 606653A693D; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 09:32:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.047
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.047 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.929, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UewN6Z7p32Ab; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 09:32:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ey0-f172.google.com (mail-ey0-f172.google.com [209.85.215.172]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 100D93A6857; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 09:32:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by eyd10 with SMTP id 10so1512017eyd.31 for <multiple recipients>; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 09:32:36 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:sender:received :in-reply-to:references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=vmZnt2TPmgYDIII3H7QyFjjvfyxDwo0sUS9J5qGYqEY=; b=O1Bt2kLmawuir7EMoRlQXDGhPCtzWX+7J/UTCZXpVhq7GIP2pdhinxHdj6AEHt8toE YDZvqf/cvJEJ8Bl45Hg9JyezNnhB77DB/nqB+eRWfp3LXZpQjjZUPf0nSbyvLogcbqZ/ 3S4jG3RVlZ0DH1CxlImEmVnOgi2HJKyv3gBmM=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; b=rul7sZIJimnTlywrDLINDQS6w8VN6WEQUSbabpxVU17M2PINlcYD+5E1ijXvZnKBb/ 7k/lF+sUP0DhBKxmS5Z2mhtgGJBHCp7hAARScngofjRtxMwImHBHXly767/KLlaFv9Aa JYb6L2fSDPsK191ktyVWQMfmZfR4gATAn2MWY=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.216.15.10 with SMTP id e10mr888643wee.21.1282235555429; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 09:32:35 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: pjnesser@gmail.com
Received: by 10.216.174.5 with HTTP; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 09:32:35 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <BE5EECA8-8125-4B76-B369-724D93AF2CB2@cs.ucla.edu>
References: <20100816152653.C48183A6765@core3.amsl.com> <AANLkTik=3OJuXAVXgxTJbz7uWtpVdAu0P6i=RGh5TQep@mail.gmail.com> <5CF029D3-B740-48E8-B66B-9C6F0E1472CC@cisco.com> <2B02F5BB-F62B-4E2C-AB16-C97C2EDAF124@cisco.com> <4C69B012.20001@dcrocker.net> <4C34E2CE1FA7B0A7B1B28C35@PST.JCK.COM> <Pine.GSO.4.63.1008180823480.780@pita.cisco.com> <BE5EECA8-8125-4B76-B369-724D93AF2CB2@cs.ucla.edu>
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2010 09:32:35 -0700
X-Google-Sender-Auth: -DkRnUsLEZNp79vPBx6MafcbPkY
Message-ID: <AANLkTikAa-Rovh49-GQuc6EHhnCTb+V7yFtOcBrjZ8jB@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: IETF Logo Wear
From: Philip Nesser <phil@nesser.com>
To: Lixia Zhang <lixia@cs.ucla.edu>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0016e64c1bbcccbe6a048e2fba8c"
Cc: IETF WG Chairs <wgchairs@ietf.org>, John C Klensin <john@jck.com>, Ole Jacobsen <ole@cisco.com>, IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>, dcrocker@bbiw.net
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2010 16:32:04 -0000

IIRC the phrase started out as "IP over Everthing" back in the days when
there was still competing network protocols and we were writing standards
for IP over Infiniband,  IP over IEEE <blah>,  etc  since there were
"competing" protocols  X.25 over blah,  IPX over blah, CNLP over blah,
etc... and network adaptors were still fairly pricey.  At some point in the
mid-90s the emphasis started to shift and we started thinking of almost
anything being an "end point" and it became more "IP on Everything".

--->  Phil


On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 9:19 AM, Lixia Zhang <lixia@cs.ucla.edu> wrote:

>
> On Aug 18, 2010, at 8:28 AM, Ole Jacobsen wrote:
>
> > But his T-shirt says "IP *on* Everything" which makes it funnier.
> >
> >
> http://jboss-uat.crn.com/channel-encyclopedia/definition-print.htm?term=IP+on+Everything&printType=image
> >
> > Ole
>
> my english is not good, but doesn't "on" carry more significant meaning
> over "over"?
> over only means that ip pkts get carried over (so the everything here only
> means different carrier)
>
> with on, "everything" can have a much broader range, from your toaster to
> mars
>
>
> >
> > On Tue, 17 Aug 2010, John C Klensin wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> --On Monday, August 16, 2010 14:39 -0700 Dave CROCKER
> >> <dhc@dcrocker.net> wrote:
> >>
> >>>
> >>> On 8/16/2010 2:30 PM, Fred Baker wrote:
> >>>> or http://www.pdphoto.org/PictureDetail.php?mat=&pg=7634
> >>>
> >>> Given that the pun is based on Vint's observing that we had IP
> >>> running "over" all sorts of different media, as I recall his
> >>> comment was "IP over Everything".
> >>
> >> Yes.  His comment and his tee-shirt.
> >>
> >>   john
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Ietf mailing list
> >> Ietf@ietf.org
> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
> >>
>
>