Minor editorial change to draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps
Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net> Mon, 03 July 2017 21:14 UTC
Return-Path: <warren@kumari.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47ED112EC01
for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Jul 2017 14:14:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001]
autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
header.d=kumari-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id LbFCY6NXQbtM for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Mon, 3 Jul 2017 14:14:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vk0-x234.google.com (mail-vk0-x234.google.com
[IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c05::234])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 63C0912EA6A
for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 Jul 2017 14:14:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vk0-x234.google.com with SMTP id 191so101328435vko.2
for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 03 Jul 2017 14:14:00 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=kumari-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623;
h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc;
bh=0zU62tE4zlq6N5aCr/wQOYzCUnUltCd7Vg6z4La+w5k=;
b=uvkIOODumUX2210FA5rQpEUpV9zWnYcxItLh6gNRNnsZ2UVod5XWmhktyTUVioUvlE
OZnxQUyv+LI6yn2UwUwrGXgdtXrDBjbMsMVlfjnN78t1H5nr5PJAYiYzqfJ319015vdd
q+6kETYfK/u6G6cwcuPvNtSxfMvUzPu+QeUCvZc98/F29MR985S3vyzOc+epq3hb+p66
iZqyP8LaXppOkfW4JzBNE/CvLAWdD2lYeSDuCYkgTfuO09AqdZio37YRD+7/elWQCE6/
peHm3HhKEwXiPCQ0sEy1VA/E+SayCImXPR75ONGH2tc4KhP4P2Dxk7MahB2oVnWmHWTh
2mlA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc;
bh=0zU62tE4zlq6N5aCr/wQOYzCUnUltCd7Vg6z4La+w5k=;
b=Hb59j8yUjysxCIXBJ5JFVAAmG/Rdf4x0uMrtOyGM4cjtvKd3k93dWTgFkD6Yxbl5v4
gXWYHzSapyaKP744V0/DULP1ay0LlWxAJY23wVo0Lx7W3ANANxsFHz74O6bMaaRcBNmY
wFnB1ZieBSaP4GoC8iVnqUROhsoLNfBeejjcRKrAYGtDAQHFcWWhkVbxIlq6hXFtolh9
Ub3OMONTxI9f+OmtPD6S4zZAduWHIT23TZBuzuZKvSiN1hZP6xSsvueOBLxeUXIuPOXd
FpAkl5J8OKbtekfDhkq7rv8BkyvxxCQ47Q24BJueY/xVkdKUlKyfLcyhEYhRP6/vloqY
HTbA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKS2vOwdtdVCDTIu/rC6pEp8002SQiIYkQvXxW6fh3Qq0CAv3Rzi1Tm/
Ola9ajXBZDLfYyt/E/rPxMWg2HIdFBgQ
X-Received: by 10.31.65.87 with SMTP id o84mr20109731vka.7.1499116439368; Mon,
03 Jul 2017 14:13:59 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.159.39.165 with HTTP; Mon, 3 Jul 2017 14:13:19 -0700 (PDT)
From: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2017 17:13:19 -0400
Message-ID: <CAHw9_iJQ31wqLavOhtMpPOBhGP4j6CLk45KHGdX5vOA+qj4nQA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Minor editorial change to draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps
To: dnsop@ietf.org
Cc: IETF Discuss <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/WnLBJTrePYmCxu2NNrHKQhc8jeo>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>,
<mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>,
<mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Jul 2017 21:14:03 -0000
Hi all, The Special-Use Domain Names Problem Statement document unsurprisingly contains a list of problems. This was an unordered list of 21 problems, including descriptions and sub-bullets. While trying to write another draft referring to specific problems it became clear that it would be much better to have this as a *numbered* list, so that one can refer to specific problems and say thing like "This helps address problem #17" instead of "This helps address the problem in the list which begins with the text "foo bar baz"... I have checked with my co-authors, the DNSOP chairs, IESG and responsible AD, and have updated the document changing the list from unordered to numbered (and adding "This is not an ordered list, it is numbered merely to facilitate referencing specific problems:"). The consensus was that this is a purely editorial change, but please scream if you disagree -- the document is on Thursday's telechat, and Benoit is the responsible AD. W On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 2:56 PM, <internet-drafts@ietf.org> wrote: > > > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. > This draft is a work item of the Domain Name System Operations of the IETF. > > Title : Special-Use Domain Names Problem Statement > Authors : Ted Lemon > Ralph Droms > Warren Kumari > Filename : draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps-07.txt > Pages : 29 > Date : 2017-07-03 > > Abstract: > The Special-Use Domain Names IANA registry policy defined in RFC 6761 > has been shown through experience to present unanticipated > challenges. This memo presents a list, intended to be comprehensive, > of the problems that have been identified. In addition it reviews > the history of Domain Names and summarizes current IETF publications > and some publications from other organizations relating to Special- > Use Domain Names. > > > The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps/ > > There are also htmlized versions available at: > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps-07 > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps-07 > > A diff from the previous version is available at: > https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps-07 > > > Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission > until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. > > Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: > ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ > > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list > DNSOP@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop -- I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad idea in the first place. This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair of pants. ---maf
- Minor editorial change to draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-… Warren Kumari
- Re: Minor editorial change to draft-ietf-dnsop-su… Randy Bush
- Re: Minor editorial change to draft-ietf-dnsop-su… Ralph Droms
- Re: Minor editorial change to draft-ietf-dnsop-su… Randy Bush
- Re: Minor editorial change to draft-ietf-dnsop-su… Ted Lemon
- Re: Minor editorial change to draft-ietf-dnsop-su… Randy Bush
- Re: Minor editorial change to draft-ietf-dnsop-su… Ted Lemon
- Re: Minor editorial change to draft-ietf-dnsop-su… Randy Bush
- Re: Minor editorial change to draft-ietf-dnsop-su… Ted Lemon
- Re: Minor editorial change to draft-ietf-dnsop-su… Randy Bush
- Re: Minor editorial change to draft-ietf-dnsop-su… Ted Lemon
- Re: Minor philosophical update to draft-ietf-dnso… John Levine
- Re: [DNSOP] Minor editorial change to draft-ietf-… william manning
- Re: [DNSOP] Minor editorial change to draft-ietf-… Ted Lemon
- Re: [DNSOP] Minor editorial change to draft-ietf-… Paul Vixie
- new DNS classes Jim Reid
- Re: new DNS classes Ted Lemon
- Re: [DNSOP] new DNS classes Paul Vixie
- Re: [DNSOP] new DNS classes David Conrad
- Re: new DNS classes John C Klensin
- Re: new DNS classes Paul Vixie
- Re: new DNS classes Mark Andrews
- Re: [DNSOP] Minor editorial change to draft-ietf-… Mark Andrews
- Re: new DNS classes or anything else John Levine
- Re: new DNS classes or anything else George Michaelson
- Re: [DNSOP] Minor editorial change to draft-ietf-… Matthew Kerwin
- Re: [DNSOP] Minor editorial change to draft-ietf-… william manning
- Re: [DNSOP] Minor editorial change to draft-ietf-… Mark Andrews
- Re: [DNSOP] Minor editorial change to draft-ietf-… Matthew Kerwin
- Re: new DNS classes Randy Bush
- Re: new DNS classes or anything else Randy Bush
- Re: Minor editorial change to draft-ietf-dnsop-su… Suzanne Woolf
- Re: new DNS classes or anything else John C Klensin
- Re: Minor editorial change to draft-ietf-dnsop-su… John C Klensin
- Re: [DNSOP] Minor editorial change to draft-ietf-… Warren Kumari
- Re: [DNSOP] Minor editorial change to draft-ietf-… Ted Lemon
- Re: Minor philosophical update to draft-ietf-dnso… Ted Lemon
- Re: Minor philosophical update to draft-ietf-dnso… John R Levine
- Re: [DNSOP] Minor editorial change to draft-ietf-… Roy T. Fielding
- Re: new DNS classes John Levine
- Re: Minor philosophical update to draft-ietf-dnso… Ted Lemon
- Re: [DNSOP] Minor editorial change to draft-ietf-… Mark Andrews
- Re: new DNS classes Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: new DNS classes John C Klensin
- Re: new DNS classes Nico Williams
- Re: new DNS classes Randy Bush
- Re: new DNS classes shogunx
- Re: [DNSOP] Minor editorial change to draft-ietf-… John C Klensin
- Re: [DNSOP] Minor editorial change to draft-ietf-… Martin Rex
- Re: new DNS classes Mark Andrews
- Re: new DNS classes Mark Andrews
- Re: [DNSOP] Minor editorial change to draft-ietf-… Mark Andrews
- Re: [DNSOP] Minor editorial change to draft-ietf-… John C Klensin
- Re: new DNS classes Nico Williams
- Re: new DNS classes Mark Andrews
- Re: [DNSOP] new DNS classes David Cake
- Re: new DNS classes Paul Vixie
- Re: new DNS classes Nico Williams
- Re: new DNS classes Nico Williams
- Re: new DNS classes Nico Williams
- Re: [DNSOP] new DNS classes Nico Williams
- Re: [DNSOP] new DNS classes David Conrad
- Re: new DNS classes william manning
- Re: new DNS classes Pete Resnick
- Re: new DNS classes Nico Williams
- Re: new DNS classes Mark Andrews
- Re: new DNS classes Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: new DNS classes Pete Resnick
- Re: new DNS classes Mark Andrews
- Re: new DNS classes Nico Williams
- Re: new DNS classes Pete Resnick
- Re: new DNS classes Randy Bush
- Re: new DNS classes Mark Andrews
- Re: new DNS classes John Levine
- Re: [DNSOP] new DNS classes Andrew Sullivan
- Re: new DNS classes John Levine
- Re: new DNS classes Phillip Hallam-Baker