Re: IAOC requesting input on (potential) meeting cities

Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com> Wed, 05 April 2017 15:13 UTC

Return-Path: <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09DC512947E for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Apr 2017 08:13:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ECvP39hJ6nP8 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Apr 2017 08:13:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg0-x235.google.com (mail-pg0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c05::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 24AE812945C for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Apr 2017 08:13:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg0-x235.google.com with SMTP id x125so9555802pgb.0 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 05 Apr 2017 08:13:51 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=AGwO4a0Lirr2M0dSHr/nLH0QOh0yVwcst4WiAwZYjuw=; b=ATIyu7ck6277FdYnB+zK35dvgCue+BRVGcgeY/knh2nqgBg3fCPC+o5ndo84R+Nl14 UzOPA5ZFQZUOEWECp1Y4uaANvIZF82K/x2Ze8FxumBWnsGh/CPdCsoYXV8wh+NoT5d73 IyjIrhQ7ZjqFfaY88Y9ZRSeNoox8/yrHyViFgDJKULbJhPpurCd63TVNBZc1x6GSr8xB qRjJZT06CG0Wdh/iHaEl3z43+IpZ9lCQROOJS/iJlR0MObAlVK9G6HCbcaYccWDMpZhw gl8QgsD5RMxYDsntBszzOY0Dh9Jrxzh61ntd58LIbegnBTx3ge3n4BicDgHu54Vdfef4 sNiA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=AGwO4a0Lirr2M0dSHr/nLH0QOh0yVwcst4WiAwZYjuw=; b=fJjzpUP0vHhdeUp/DqZiuFCpCoe4Uz+6Emq3gpLEiGzH8Ycy2uFLzo+6GNpPFmg5t1 e0o3J2+Uaa9HqrYxt9dsKNEKEHPGHeg9kp3al6L9NdCItoN+Op7qwDG8jGee3DrDODgH 6bP5NFOQp/X20yBmlFL+Ke5aRVL5H3AcJB2uncu8959w+G9g8jwkQpHqNHwdBM4CWXQ5 B5+9XRE/k6341wieJpODkN4UR2rmcUnyf4tw5jQzGquY4+Rvk4/L2ZK44QYsQtJUQv8A godB8H5rK3zQpgeP3zAtkQT1kPiK/50kHv9xCgR7+RqqV/8khXcXB20nbMm1j3G+2Rfy 3fPQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H0HsFEAfkev62XsnmAR/CEyAYtT+O2rglUTc2cUIt+0IfFV3q8g8n9OwY5VrXph9g==
X-Received: by 10.98.86.71 with SMTP id k68mr28721317pfb.215.1491405230795; Wed, 05 Apr 2017 08:13:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2601:647:4d01:db10:e4bc:4cc2:2258:7a5? ([2601:647:4d01:db10:e4bc:4cc2:2258:7a5]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b74sm38233247pfd.90.2017.04.05.08.13.49 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 05 Apr 2017 08:13:49 -0700 (PDT)
From: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <F51651E3-7668-4D00-8879-979680E19E38@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_3467AF1C-5239-46C2-87FF-1533962550C9"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.2 \(3259\))
Subject: Re: IAOC requesting input on (potential) meeting cities
Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2017 08:13:47 -0700
In-Reply-To: <cd5a3b9d-29dd-0d8b-b0a4-2a2465ea89b1@comcast.net>
Cc: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>, IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
To: Michael StJohns <mstjohns@comcast.net>
References: <149096990336.4276.3480662759931758139.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <9fee9874-1306-07a2-a84a-4e09381a5336@cisco.com> <E67FDB14-9895-48E0-A334-167172D322DB@nohats.ca> <20170403152624.GA11714@gsp.org> <93404c29-78ba-ff9b-9170-f5f2a5389a31@gmail.com> <E068F01A-B720-4E7A-A60F-AA5BDA22D535@consulintel.es> <20170404181505.GA4004@localhost> <CAAQiQRcvu-BfBA_NEqZwXsHEn6ujpa2=w7P5Vu2f6GLXjKqkcA@mail.gmail.com> <5DDF7585-8722-4C21-B998-CFD06A44EFE2@tzi.org> <7B3FF839-022B-4D58-96F9-1DEDEE0DA3C5@comcast.net> <162603E4-DE07-495B-B3A6-9F58D03D8DF8@tzi.org> <620C9C4C-413C-439C-9109-B30BBAB921B1@comcast.net> <cd5a3b9d-29dd-0d8b-b0a4-2a2465ea89b1@comcast.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3259)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/WovgDC5MVSIs2iBbR3YLac2OZOw>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Apr 2017 15:13:53 -0000

> On Apr 5, 2017, at 7:26 AM, Michael StJohns <mstjohns@comcast.net> wrote:
> 
> I meant to include (damn iPad):
> 
> Carsten's original email was
>> Statistically, the chance of any IETFer being killed last week was about 1.5 %.
> 
> "Any IETFer being killed" (I read the above as "Any [given] IETFer")  is the .00051% chance.  "At least one IETFer" is the .5% chance.  "Anyone in the IETF" could mean either - precision is important and I still don't actually know which Carsten meant.

I am happy that no IETFer got killed.  We did have some heated debates :-)

Bob