Re: doubt about WG for e-mail protocol enhancement
"John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> Tue, 22 October 2013 21:51 UTC
Return-Path: <prvs=00008272c5=johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71ED811E8289 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Oct 2013 14:51:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.356
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.356 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.057, BAYES_00=-2.599, MANGLED_SPAM=2.3]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 54Fzq-ayfJnm for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Oct 2013 14:51:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from leila.iecc.com (leila6.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:4c:6569:6c61]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F36F11E82C8 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Oct 2013 14:50:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 52935 invoked from network); 22 Oct 2013 21:49:45 -0000
Received: from leila.iecc.com (64.57.183.34) by mail1.iecc.com with QMQP; 22 Oct 2013 21:49:45 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=5266f2f8.xn--i8sz2z.k1310; i=johnl@user.iecc.com; bh=cf3rP4f6D/NC6emsT0p/8vNqTBq59Ff82X8pN0nkRGc=; b=OzeWY9CjQn2+tY0vLbD8flLwgnxtqz8y9H5pt+quvijV3Q7iKNFYAAcMzChDc1GrFPC8BJ/dv70mDKaJS0bLWfQvCdBW8rQOTyPiLh0HlCkrEiF8tLluLcTA/f7S7qSMsFOmE+a74TOdNwh9xBw1+hlHxIXqBRILLt6bjX+q3sTD8wKuyMRJu4w6yKXSRLiTsmsAgUteeFcMC9SUSTXp6xylpbkNA8omLhKrsbxx3RqJ2Zp34ojnrPA6fWMKzNAu
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=5266f2f8.xn--i8sz2z.k1310; olt=johnl@user.iecc.com; bh=cf3rP4f6D/NC6emsT0p/8vNqTBq59Ff82X8pN0nkRGc=; b=OTejpiLDXPiG8yGDNZT0qleyTyY46FdPYW0KzegMXZ3i6HyRfcM0Cx9UxrUaPWt8AD1uDF9mXoFjAYTvMa3vUZ2DHMtXpzGVH9xgJ/iAxmI1EYpxU1CoKgq0Yurj1SGvH7ZOQwqyB1eGwRMrbY/JhRlo3KYrlsX6+nrNcUduUE1JHaeiKE9762PTvg9UpDQgdmOGpNkBWbYa+h32T91ATlhsT3uZ99+r6XQ6F9aqvc7tgZXITBK796ghJcUqucTb
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 21:49:22 -0000
Message-ID: <20131022214922.3673.qmail@joyce.lan>
From: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: doubt about WG for e-mail protocol enhancement
In-Reply-To: <201310222235.25509.envite@rolamasao.org>
Organization:
X-Headerized: yes
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 21:51:31 -0000
The appsarea list would be the appropriate place, but first you might want to check the wiki from the former Anti-Spam Research Group and see if we already know about it. http://wiki.asrg.sp.am/wiki/Taxonomy_of_anti-spam_techniques R's, John >I have an idea for e-mail enhancement regading security and spam. Which Working Group should I join to? > >Thanks in advance > >Noel Torres >er Envite >------------------------- >A: Because it breaks the logical flow of discussion. >Q: Why is top posting bad?
- doubt about WG for e-mail protocol enhancement Noel David Torres Taño
- Re: doubt about WG for e-mail protocol enhancement John Levine
- Re: doubt about WG for e-mail protocol enhancement John C Klensin