More example TLDs in 2606bis? (was: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Checklist)

"Frank Ellermann" <nobody@xyzzy.claranet.de> Wed, 09 July 2008 17:27 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietf-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ietf-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1B0F3A6B11; Wed, 9 Jul 2008 10:27:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 849093A6B11 for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Jul 2008 10:27:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.947
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.947 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.348, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ngtFgKsLdv7q for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Jul 2008 10:27:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 199103A689E for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Jul 2008 10:27:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1KGdRh-0000q1-GS for ietf@ietf.org; Wed, 09 Jul 2008 17:27:14 +0000
Received: from hmbg-d9b88e14.pool.mediaways.net ([217.184.142.20]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 09 Jul 2008 17:27:13 +0000
Received: from hmdmhdfmhdjmzdtjmzdtzktdkztdjz by hmbg-d9b88e14.pool.mediaways.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 09 Jul 2008 17:27:13 +0000
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: ietf@ietf.org
From: Frank Ellermann <nobody@xyzzy.claranet.de>
Subject: More example TLDs in 2606bis? (was: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Checklist)
Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2008 19:27:35 +0200
Organization: <http://purl.net/xyzzy>
Lines: 29
Message-ID: <g52sd6$bi2$1@ger.gmane.org>
References: <20080708184427.5D55F28C0EC@core3.amsl.com><0e6701c8e1db$6b9603a0$6501a8c0@china.huawei.com> <1907905599.20080709093728@pobox.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: hmbg-d9b88e14.pool.mediaways.net
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1914
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1914
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Frank Ellermann <hmdmhdfmhdjmzdtjmzdtzktdkztdjz@gmail.com>
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org

Bill McQuillan wrote:

> I wonder if it would make it easier to use "example" DNS
> names if, in addition to the verbose and clumsy: "*.example",
> IMHO, we reserved gTLDs like "*.foo", "*.bar", "*.bat", 
> "*.baz", as well as the one used quite frequently on this
> list lately: "*.tld", for use as example DNS names.
 
> Or do we assume that economic concerns would triumph here?

After about 100 articles with "2606" in the subject finally a
note which really is about 2606, even if not in the subject :-)

There is certainly a tradition to use *.tld in examples, and
we could say that we want this officially reserved.  While at
it we could also grab the 11 IDN example labels used together
with the 11 IDN test TLDs in the (running) IDN test.  That
would give us 13 example TLDs, plus three known *.example.cno.
IMO more than enough, otherwise we could add *.lit to the set.

But the keyword is "grab" as in "domain grabbing".  Without a
clear technical demand for this it could upset folks with an
interest and the money to buy TLD .tld for dubious purposes.

So far the support to grab those 11 IDN example labels as TLDs
was not overhelming, otherwise you would already see it in the 
2606bis draft (idnabis-test-tlds).

 Frank

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf