IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets

Joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com> Tue, 24 April 2012 17:05 UTC

Return-Path: <joelja@bogus.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55E5E21E809E for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 10:05:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zl4AUPeh4irZ for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 10:05:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nagasaki.bogus.com (nagasaki.bogus.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::81]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB40C21E809B for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 10:05:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 01871b-ssaoji.corp.zynga.com (host-64-47-153-50.masergy.com [64.47.153.50]) (authenticated bits=0) by nagasaki.bogus.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q3OH5aQw085552 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 24 Apr 2012 17:05:37 GMT (envelope-from joelja@bogus.com)
Message-ID: <4F96DD5C.5050506@bogus.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 10:05:32 -0700
From: Joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120327 Thunderbird/11.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Michael StJohns <mstjohns@comcast.net>
Subject: Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets
References: <F6ED0766FFC28D063B59F901@[192.168.12.58]> <201204241621.q3OGLX6k028613@fs4113.wdf.sap.corp> <20120424165006.AA56121E804D@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20120424165006.AA56121E804D@ietfa.amsl.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (nagasaki.bogus.com [147.28.0.81]); Tue, 24 Apr 2012 17:05:37 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>, ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 17:05:39 -0000

On 4/24/12 09:50 , Michael StJohns wrote:
>
> Martin - you and everyone else in the room gave permission by being in the room.  That's what the NOTE WELL is all about.  So no, not illegal. 

Specifically every registered attendee has accepted during the
registration process the note-well.

> "A participant in any IETF activity is deemed to accept all IETF rules of process, as documented in Best Current Practices RFCs and IESG Statements.
> 
> A participant in any IETF activity acknowledges that written, audio and video records of meetings may be made and may be available to the public. "
> 
> 
> 
>> -Martin
> 
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email