IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: WG Review: Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting & Conformance (dmarc)x

Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> Sat, 19 July 2014 08:32 UTC

Return-Path: <randy@psg.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 416931A0328 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 19 Jul 2014 01:32:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xHJlXsDYdJ5M for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 19 Jul 2014 01:32:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ran.psg.com (ran.psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:8006::18]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 305881A02E1 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 19 Jul 2014 01:32:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=ryuu.psg.com.psg.com) by ran.psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from <randy@psg.com>) id 1X8Q49-0006mR-Ke; Sat, 19 Jul 2014 08:32:25 +0000
Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2014 04:32:25 -0400
Message-ID: <m27g39agva.wl%randy@psg.com>
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: Stuart Barkley <stuartb@4gh.net>
Subject: Re: WG Review: Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting & Conformance (dmarc)x
In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.11.1407190348580.32743@freeman.4gh.net>
References: <20140717024645.1605.qmail@joyce.lan> <EAC6F6031A4AF95070AF35C5@JcK-HP8200.jck.com> <53C7E02B.9050405@dcrocker.net> <1C6468F6C7AB38FC3996C8E2@JcK-HP8200.jck.com> <53C83191.5@dcrocker.net> <alpine.BSF.2.11.1407190348580.32743@freeman.4gh.net>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/22.3 Mule/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/WwPDUDfaCQ7uw6I33iZZayIN2dc
Cc: dcrocker@bbiw.net, ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2014 08:32:34 -0000

> It is this "collateral damage" from the broken aspects of DMARC that
> is disturbing.  The proponents of DMARC need to look at "the current
> details of the DMARC specification" and better understand the damage
> that they have imposed on the rest of the Internet.

they're big.  they think they do not have to.

randy

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email