Re: Last Call: draft-irtf-asrg-dnsbl (DNS Blacklists and Whitelists)

Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com> Fri, 07 November 2008 23:39 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietf-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ietf-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EF723A6B96; Fri, 7 Nov 2008 15:39:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3352C3A6B96 for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Nov 2008 15:39:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.628
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.628 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.172, BAYES_00=-2.599, SARE_SUB_RAND_LETTRS4=0.799]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TUeIg4TIgSnJ for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Nov 2008 15:39:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from m1.imap-partners.net (m1.imap-partners.net [64.13.152.131]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EB193A6A3B for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 7 Nov 2008 15:39:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lust.indecency.org (adsl-155-115-114.tys.bellsouth.net [72.155.115.114]) by m1.imap-partners.net (MOS 3.10.3-GA) with ESMTP id BEC23881 (AUTH admin@network-heretics.com) for ietf@ietf.org; Fri, 7 Nov 2008 15:38:43 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <4914D181.9090605@network-heretics.com>
Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2008 18:38:41 -0500
From: Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Macintosh/20080914)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Livingood, Jason" <Jason_Livingood@cable.comcast.com>
Subject: Re: Last Call: draft-irtf-asrg-dnsbl (DNS Blacklists and Whitelists)
References: <20081107111744.GA31018@nic.fr> <20081107141821.79303.qmail@simone.iecc.com> <45AEC6EF95942140888406588E1A660206A5D881@PACDCEXCMB04.cable.comcast.com>
In-Reply-To: <45AEC6EF95942140888406588E1A660206A5D881@PACDCEXCMB04.cable.comcast.com>
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org

DNSBLs work to degrade the interoperability of email, to make its
delivery less reliable and system less accountable for failures.  They
do NOT meet the "no known technical omissions" criterion required of
standards-track documents.

The fact that they are widely used is sad, not a justification for
standardization.

> 
> As an operator of a large mail domain, I'd like to reiterate John's
> comments above.  DNSBLs work, are very cost (and computationally)
> effective, and are in widespread use.
> 
> Regards
> Jason
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf mailing list
> Ietf@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf