IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: new DNS classes

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Tue, 04 July 2017 17:58 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C92B132630 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Jul 2017 10:58:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.601
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SGzcQm7RMTvu for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Jul 2017 10:58:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk0-x22e.google.com (mail-qk0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D467B13262D for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Jul 2017 10:58:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id p21so173528766qke.3 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 04 Jul 2017 10:58:31 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=4qn8CsmUp3VsJv1LXuhDtWSBYCrAZ0i8c5lergRSQ8U=; b=CBoJg9y19WxiAtNSE10Gsan7axBKZTvGcLOf3MBk7LTxERKUxZS5bWiBfLSrCmehcb bWXnCgtKXVzTIdOBU2C79Nwf3/M7mC5muEkig1NA2ezyS1b+etatndPDQPEy78pG0AcH mYZ6ZES8Zploe+AmU4n6xxbEZMWXbrWutpmpCADojNZXFyewXYmZB33BRsu0SxWhJI13 tW97fvSZTJ1/v2NjOcx86eQ9NtxWQofeNBwul3Sn5/qTJRbrpB5Wb2nFGjkf5nC3bEG6 rTYb1XukEQYN6z2/B/1O+smtnIkcpnxlh04HPIlyFUncNf7Q22Yih4qCRLJdhPamM1XI EBgQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=4qn8CsmUp3VsJv1LXuhDtWSBYCrAZ0i8c5lergRSQ8U=; b=C1i73tUp0oOj4V25iDWZiHV5MPwAY/C4c5kBSvIPtT5HXFMtpXXPKJzbVKTQdVwtag gm+AWibUCiNr/9n7y40U7OmmGM0FjlvC6uIUaVUX2tgxEN5QNT3cHo3/0DiqmrLaWzKp 5YDSdMDzseF259DcZW7m9NdBd0fo+sLiAd74jLVgEf070jMf5wCyZrP9FjcZNcMZuLxy hYIXhMPediMweraq0BfhXPIhCkIP5qsIAAxFwFsTZAnNP9xoXTnI0Btydy0wLzEeTEgc NsHLTzfSz/q8JjlPbCu2E4CDbsWmjbpTguibLnypJFy8a3XkGx728bwy1ccPT1F5su+S xoNg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIVw112X1GMEIzCbKkIdEAZQF8HGCfwIhpstZR9lnJJI4nwVneHKbqxI mC+8HAQ0eBVgFONJ
X-Received: by 10.55.145.6 with SMTP id t6mr17575675qkd.101.1499191111009; Tue, 04 Jul 2017 10:58:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.30.114] (c-73-167-64-188.hsd1.ma.comcast.net. [73.167.64.188]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o23sm15406937qko.67.2017.07.04.10.58.30 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 04 Jul 2017 10:58:30 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Subject: Re: new DNS classes
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Mailer: iPad Mail (15A5304i)
In-Reply-To: <E739C1CB-E60E-4B4B-99CF-1E6C68CB6926@rfc1035.com>
Date: Tue, 04 Jul 2017 13:58:29 -0400
Cc: Paul Vixie <paul@redbarn.org>, Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>, dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>, IETF Rinse Repeat <ietf@ietf.org>, william manning <chinese.apricot@gmail.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <0E91DDA9-EFF5-4682-972D-95491A3DC22B@fugue.com>
References: <CAHw9_iJQ31wqLavOhtMpPOBhGP4j6CLk45KHGdX5vOA+qj4nQA@mail.gmail.com> <m2a84kzm4y.wl-randy@psg.com> <F98FEA1C-3F3F-4344-8B07-996AAD899CC2@fugue.com> <m2shicxr0h.wl-randy@psg.com> <A70FD34B-000A-4748-B1B2-BF6DF66C7D6C@fugue.com> <m2podgxq97.wl-randy@psg.com> <5F120298-CD66-4CB6-9DC5-0C5DF6F02CC7@fugue.com> <CACfw2hhx+-Z=7ZnnaOkToc+Bd7aKDpBFt+nFUxkt9sKqLn4D8Q@mail.gmail.com> <2DF1AFC7-643B-4610-8EB8-0616D3D0B024@fugue.com> <595BD53E.60701@redbarn.org> <E739C1CB-E60E-4B4B-99CF-1E6C68CB6926@rfc1035.com>
To: Jim Reid <jim@rfc1035.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/X0rqlm5Y1nwWCG80lFowlrH6iVU>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Jul 2017 17:58:38 -0000

On Jul 4, 2017, at 1:53 PM, Jim Reid <jim@rfc1035.com> wrote:
> Attempts have already been made to do just that. It would be nice not to have to put out those fires all over again.

Realistically, at some point the damage the ICANN process has done will have to get fixed, just like the damage the itu did got sort of fixed.  Like that case, the results will be messy. But we’ll all be gone by then, I suspect.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email