IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: What to incorporate (Re: Options for IETF administrative restructuring)

Dean Anderson <dean@av8.com> Thu, 02 September 2004 17:55 UTC

Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA23521; Thu, 2 Sep 2004 13:55:43 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1C2vqh-0000Pm-Cd; Thu, 02 Sep 2004 13:58:16 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1C2vhE-0006Dg-JT; Thu, 02 Sep 2004 13:48:28 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1C2vbR-0002kS-L7 for ietf@megatron.ietf.org; Thu, 02 Sep 2004 13:42:30 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA22172 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 2 Sep 2004 13:42:28 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from cirrus.av8.net ([130.105.36.66]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1C2vdr-0007nU-UN for ietf@ietf.org; Thu, 02 Sep 2004 13:45:01 -0400
Received: from cirrus.av8.net (cirrus.av8.net [130.105.36.66]) (authenticated bits=0) by cirrus.av8.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i82HfqbZ019590 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Thu, 2 Sep 2004 13:41:55 -0400
Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2004 13:41:52 -0400
From: Dean Anderson <dean@av8.com>
X-X-Sender: dean@cirrus.av8.net
To: Harald Tveit Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
In-Reply-To: <77160AB1CBDE5AE8E27F638D@askvoll.hjemme.alvestrand.no>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0409021336280.19318-100000@cirrus.av8.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"
X-Spam-Score: 2.7 (++)
X-Scan-Signature: d6b246023072368de71562c0ab503126
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: What to incorporate (Re: Options for IETF administrative restructuring)
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 2.7 (++)
X-Scan-Signature: 93238566e09e6e262849b4f805833007

On Thu, 2 Sep 2004, Harald Tveit Alvestrand wrote:

> scenarios C and D envision incorporating the *support function* for the 
> IETF. The IETF would remain an undefined entity under these scenarios.
> 
> I've had another suggestion that the IETF (the real technical process 
> entity) should become a formally recognizable entity of some sort (possibly 
> an unincorporated organization). 

The IETF is already describted as an activity of the ISOC, which is
incorprated.

I think the IETF also has paid employees. Aren't these people paid by the
ISOC?  If not, please correct this information.

> But that's distinct from the idea of incorporating the support function,
> and is NOT described in the current document.



_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

v2.26.15 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status