IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: proposed DTN workgroup - what is process being followed?

Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> Sun, 19 October 2014 05:47 UTC

Return-Path: <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3B6F1A1BC4; Sat, 18 Oct 2014 22:47:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zQ9IE-UkJb1t; Sat, 18 Oct 2014 22:47:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p130.piuha.net (p130.piuha.net [193.234.218.130]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F9081A1BB3; Sat, 18 Oct 2014 22:47:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBACD2CC5F; Sun, 19 Oct 2014 08:47:12 +0300 (EEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at piuha.net
Received: from p130.piuha.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (p130.piuha.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4TRys-6Nlajc; Sun, 19 Oct 2014 08:47:12 +0300 (EEST)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2a00:1d50:2::130]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC6712CC5D; Sun, 19 Oct 2014 08:47:10 +0300 (EEST)
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_7E210BC8-2459-4B48-83CF-A29855998605"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
Subject: Re: proposed DTN workgroup - what is process being followed?
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
In-Reply-To: <1413642432.88432.YahooMailNeo@web28901.mail.ir2.yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2014 22:47:08 -0700
Message-Id: <0A52F329-C449-41CC-BB7A-534107F3A03C@piuha.net>
References: <1413638841.79127.YahooMailNeo@web28903.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> <1413642432.88432.YahooMailNeo@web28901.mail.ir2.yahoo.com>
To: Lloyd Wood <lloyd.wood@yahoo.co.uk>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/X6nB52qq2e0NozylL_ffBz8vrBM
Cc: "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>, "dtn@ietf.org" <dtn@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2014 05:47:23 -0000

Lloyd,

Good question. It is customary that working groups being proposed to be created (like DTN is) are given a slot in the schedule. If the working group creation goes through before the meeting, the slot will be a regular working group meeting. If it does not go through, depending on circumstances we’d either run the meeting as a BOF or cancel it.

That was the process part. I’ll let others comment on the substance part of your comments.

Jari

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email