Re: Proposal to create IETF IPR Advisory Board

"Steven M. Bellovin" <smb@cs.columbia.edu> Thu, 19 February 2009 06:06 UTC

Return-Path: <smb@cs.columbia.edu>
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34ACF3A69E4 for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Feb 2009 22:06:48 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.357
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.357 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.242, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nnDrSa6kAmFi for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Feb 2009 22:06:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from machshav.com (machshav.com [198.180.150.44]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 187B43A682D for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 Feb 2009 22:06:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: by machshav.com (Postfix, from userid 512) id F166132A2E5; Thu, 19 Feb 2009 01:06:57 -0500 (EST)
Received: from yellowstone.machshav.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by machshav.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD5613290E7; Thu, 19 Feb 2009 01:06:56 -0500 (EST)
Received: from cs.columbia.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by yellowstone.machshav.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7057296D2C; Thu, 19 Feb 2009 01:06:55 -0500 (EST)
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 01:06:55 -0500
From: "Steven M. Bellovin" <smb@cs.columbia.edu>
To: Christian Huitema <huitema@windows.microsoft.com>
Subject: Re: Proposal to create IETF IPR Advisory Board
Message-ID: <20090219010655.0995952d@cs.columbia.edu>
In-Reply-To: <8EFB68EAE061884A8517F2A755E8B60A19DAFCA52D@NA-EXMSG-W601.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com>
References: <20090217234217.D9FB66BE56A@mercury.lcs.mit.edu> <20090217191240.029b7d57@cs.columbia.edu> <C12A100E0BB445E5B8C144839AE93A42@LROSENTOSHIBA> <20090218022441.GA3600@mini-me.lan> <8EFB68EAE061884A8517F2A755E8B60A19DAFCA52D@NA-EXMSG-W601.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com>
Organization: Columbia University
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.14.7; x86_64--netbsd)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 06:06:48 -0000

On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 21:54:49 -0800
Christian Huitema <huitema@windows.microsoft.com> wrote:

> This discussion of IPR seems to be running in circle. Can't we switch
> to something else, e.g. whether RFC could be written in some other
> format than ASCII text?
> 
Sorry, that idea is patented or something.  No, I've got it -- it's a
W3C trade secret.  


		--Steve Bellovin, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb