答复: Agenda experiment for IETF 103 in November in Bangkok

"Zhenghaomian (Zhenghaomian, Optical &Microwave Technology Research Dept)" <zhenghaomian@huawei.com> Wed, 06 June 2018 01:12 UTC

Return-Path: <zhenghaomian@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C922130E03 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Jun 2018 18:12:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AQHR2eH5Y4jt for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Jun 2018 18:12:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 40A91130E14 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Jun 2018 18:12:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhreml702-cah.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.106]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 40E439293C6B0 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Jun 2018 02:12:53 +0100 (IST)
Received: from DGGEML402-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.17.38) by lhreml702-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.43) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.382.0; Wed, 6 Jun 2018 02:12:53 +0100
Received: from DGGEML511-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.1.61]) by DGGEML402-HUB.china.huawei.com ([fe80::fca6:7568:4ee3:c776%31]) with mapi id 14.03.0382.000; Wed, 6 Jun 2018 09:12:47 +0800
From: "Zhenghaomian (Zhenghaomian, Optical &Microwave Technology Research Dept)" <zhenghaomian@huawei.com>
To: Daniel Harkins <dharkins@lounge.org>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: =?utf-8?B?562U5aSNOiBBZ2VuZGEgZXhwZXJpbWVudCBmb3IgSUVURiAxMDMgaW4gTm92?= =?utf-8?Q?ember_in_Bangkok?=
Thread-Topic: Agenda experiment for IETF 103 in November in Bangkok
Thread-Index: AQHT6SkbQiIkXRLuq0KcniWa//IYfqQtIcqAgBzsBkT//4mPAIAIJVUAgADXd7A=
Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2018 01:12:47 +0000
Message-ID: <E0C26CAA2504C84093A49B2CAC3261A43B696818@dggeml511-mbx.china.huawei.com>
References: <3678CC52-1F1B-4B17-8654-E75C9B63AD39@ietf.org> <4A95BA014132FF49AE685FAB4B9F17F66B043AE7@sjceml521-mbx.china.huawei.com> <16359c65828.27d3.9b4188e636579690ba6c69f2c8a0f1fd@labn.net> <bc59dec2-ea2d-e920-df24-43c7bb2345d9@ericsson.com> <10827.1527782174@localhost> <e22bef9c-df0d-64e4-ef4e-fad0304164cb@lounge.org>
In-Reply-To: <e22bef9c-df0d-64e4-ef4e-fad0304164cb@lounge.org>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.57.78.212]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/XDfo2MP5Y4eX8vW556xpEZlAU1A>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2018 01:12:59 -0000

I would support this, as the joint work with other Societies would be useful in many technical areas. 

It would be more than appreciated if IETF can spend efforts on organizing such workshops, thanks. 

Best wishes,
Haomian

-----邮件原件-----
发件人: ietf [mailto:ietf-bounces@ietf.org] 代表 Daniel Harkins
发送时间: 2018年6月6日 4:20
收件人: ietf@ietf.org
主题: Re: Agenda experiment for IETF 103 in November in Bangkok


On 5/31/18 8:56 AM, Michael Richardson wrote:
> János Farkas <janos.farkas@ericsson.com> wrote:
>      > I'm afraid IETF 103 may not be the best IETF meeting to experiment with
>      > ending the IETF meeting on Thursday.
>
> Interesting.
>
>      > Given the unique opportunity of this November, we have started to investigate
>      > the possibility of joint workshops of different groups of the two
>      > organizations. I'm aware of two: IETF - IEEE 802 Coordination workshop and
>      > DetNet - TSN/IEC workshop, but there may be more.
>
> Maybe some of these things could occur on the Friday?

   Exactly!

>
>      > IEEE 802 Plenary meetings start on Monday
>      > (http://802world.org/plenary/schedule/).
>
>      > Increasing the gap between the two meetings may decrease the participation
>      > thus the success of such workshops
>
> So the gap will grow from two days to three days.

   There are IEEE 802.11 meetings that happen on Sunday and I expect that other 802 groups may also have leadership/planning meetings on Sunday. These are at the level of IETF - IEEE 802 Coordination though.
Your average Joe IETFer and Jane IEEEer will not be going to these.

   Increasing the gap from 2 to 3 days does not seem to pose a problem to people who would be attending these meetings anyway. If you're gonna stay in Bangkok over the weekend then you're gonna stay in Bangkok over the weekend.

>
> I'm not among those who is involved in IEEE802 meetings, but if I 
> were, I don't think the change would negatively affect my decision to 
> stay: it's not like I get home a day earlier either way.
>
> (If I were among those who had the time and funding to do both 
> meetings, I would find the back to back meetings would be a 
> significant dis-incentive to attend both. I don't think it contributes 
> to cross-fertilization, and I think that it creates significant 
> family-based barriers to entry)
>
> Having the three day gap might even make the gap easier to enjoy, if 
> one did bring a family with you.
>
> To me, the only thing that would change this is if we moved the 
> Hackathon to the weekend afterwards, such that the gap was entirely 
> filled. That would also potentially mix hackathoners with IETF and IEEE people.

   As someone who will probably attend both IETF and IEEE 802 and who is not in IETF or IEEE 802 leadership, I'd really appreciate a break to get out of the hotel (and maybe even Bangkok). Yes, the gap would not only make it easier to enjoy but also easier to tolerate.

   I think your idea of the moving the hackathon to the weekend afterwards to be very interesting. If IEEE 802 was able to promote it between now and then it might result in the cross-pollination you refer to-- more people with a different perspective. That might actually be a reason to stay in Bangkok and it might increase the number of people who stay during the gap (beyond the IETF - IEEE 802 leadership).

   Dan.