Re: IETF chair's blog

Arturo Servin <aservin@lacnic.net> Tue, 26 February 2013 04:04 UTC

Return-Path: <aservin@lacnic.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C6C121E8173 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 20:04:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.688
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.688 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-4.288, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_DYNAMIC_HCC=4.295, HELO_MISMATCH_NET=0.611, RDNS_NONE=0.1, RELAY_IS_220=2.118]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XqoUwbOWQ+I6 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 20:04:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.lacnic.net.uy (mail.lacnic.net.uy [IPv6:2001:13c7:7001:4000::3]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9866121E816D for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 20:04:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 221.149.dhcp.conference.apricot.net (unknown [220.247.149.221]) by mail.lacnic.net.uy (Postfix) with ESMTP id D227C308424; Tue, 26 Feb 2013 02:04:18 -0200 (UYST)
Message-ID: <512C3445.60709@lacnic.net>
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 12:04:21 +0800
From: Arturo Servin <aservin@lacnic.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130216 Thunderbird/17.0.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Alejandro Acosta <alejandroacostaalamo@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: IETF chair's blog
References: <1BBAE003-DEA4-462A-998D-863F6FF90A69@ietf.org> <51298B1E.60007@lacnic.net> <512A5A10.4090406@acm.org> <8C48B86A895913448548E6D15DA7553B7A52DA@xmb-rcd-x09.cisco.com> <512B257A.3030902@lacnic.net> <CAOmxzdzxNejS_D3wHm_rPHBmAYZDXVK5odhP2ge057NQRu2mWw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAOmxzdzxNejS_D3wHm_rPHBmAYZDXVK5odhP2ge057NQRu2mWw@mail.gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-LACNIC.uy-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
X-LACNIC.uy-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-LACNIC.uy-MailScanner-SpamCheck:
X-LACNIC.uy-MailScanner-From: aservin@lacnic.net
Cc: "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 04:04:55 -0000

	It appears that the path that this discussion has followed has proven
your point.

/as

On 25/02/2013 23:31, Alejandro Acosta wrote:
> On 2/25/13, Arturo Servin <aservin@lacnic.net> wrote:
>> Fred,
>>
>> 	I am not convinced that social nets (proprietary or not) are yet a good
>> tool to do IETF work. They are good to communicate one-way and some
>> informal two-ways, but that's all (at least for now)
>>
>> 	What I had in mind was something very simple such that the IETF chair
>> could do is to automatically post to twitter, facebook, etc whenever
>> there is a new post from his blog and receive from communication using
>> those tools (besides the comments in the blog). But that is all.
> 
> This scenario sounds good for me.  Of course this is not a
> substitution of the mailing list, this is complementary. It's nice to
> receive a tweet with the subject of the blog post and the URL to click
> on it.
> 
> Some time ago in this mailing list we were discussing that the average
> age of IETF is getting old (of course, there are many exceptions). Did
> you know that young people do not use email as much as us?. Saying
> that, this can be a good way to bring young people to IETF.
> 
> Alejandro Acosta,
> 
> 
> {...}
>