Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?

Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> Mon, 30 January 2017 10:02 UTC

Return-Path: <randy@psg.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6581F1289C4 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Jan 2017 02:02:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-3.199, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zWkVAbVR2v4x for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Jan 2017 02:02:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ran.psg.com (ran.psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:8006::18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5855012998B for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Jan 2017 02:02:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=ryuu.psg.com) by ran.psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from <randy@psg.com>) id 1cY8ml-0000os-Ov; Mon, 30 Jan 2017 10:02:08 +0000
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2017 19:02:05 +0900
Message-ID: <m2lgtseuhu.wl-randy@psg.com>
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
Subject: Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?
In-Reply-To: <4D233FE8-6E84-446F-A8ED-604E4F7EAB99@piuha.net>
References: <CAAUuzMQwk5v+3HA+KFrsCZfbNSXFpgBE0XdKfJWHgDss9-VkTw@mail.gmail.com> <CAHw9_iJ78ECZ5x8LsR53KhRFnbhi3gV7n8yzG07e1wbN-SG14Q@mail.gmail.com> <8f5ef9ac-b62b-863a-0a0e-f5d2b329de09@nostrum.com> <20170129134410.GA14422@gsp.org> <4D233FE8-6E84-446F-A8ED-604E4F7EAB99@piuha.net>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/24.5 Mule/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/XGrrlJV6rO8-r_H6VASd6gI_Dio>
Cc: IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2017 10:02:11 -0000

let me spin jari's point a bit differently.

if the outrageous actions out of washington are less than one a week, i
for one will be surprised.  and i strongly encourage protest, funding
the aclu, etc etc.  [ and i have been pushing back against stateside
meetings for a looooong time ]

but there will soon be violations of rights and sanity which are not so
obvious to the general public, but will be in the internet community's
domain.  the internet community will need all the energy and resources
we can muster to deal with those directly on our turf.

expect years of outrageous fascist hateful acts and plan your resource
expenditures accordingly.

randy