Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"?

Michael Thomas <mike@mtcc.com> Mon, 19 April 2021 20:19 UTC

Return-Path: <mike@fresheez.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4DD73A4267 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 13:19:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.15
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.15 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mtcc.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PMP9Yz_BrW3S for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 13:19:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pj1-x1032.google.com (mail-pj1-x1032.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1032]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 161BE3A4263 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 13:19:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pj1-x1032.google.com with SMTP id cu16so16587141pjb.4 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 13:19:09 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mtcc.com; s=fluffulence; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-language; bh=vuikAPu1VeX64pFmNbSi5SDl6uxahkfgF3BzbIvfR24=; b=hYAXFqpr09JfOrI0W1ZretSsd5iGXjsp0cphYXpbH+sfw2lDL/thnSZNKT3yzjMcri OSmHt71QpATosEisZu+8ORGKlJmlpxhYiqxI3jmeNEFmBz2oXNiDQgWOx4rc7pDT6jpS 5Oj3LsXLfj71bl57/hbE64ZBdF0i5uVlmMaiEJaNMaf6w03ffpvx9r8pdrlqoqTa6q4x Tr9CCxqdn5zwQy//VTFXLQV6c963R46plNs9khEuoIKNYJZveO56QhRsnQMmvC+D89kv FVruSk0mOYfgY0HNbPIlycydfxeuGxCh4XptYcOD3tR0KNnw2/Nml5mK76CnLqR6zbLk 1oPw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-language; bh=vuikAPu1VeX64pFmNbSi5SDl6uxahkfgF3BzbIvfR24=; b=YraGcfnZtBSrvaM2tb+Wa5R713CRpVbkzeWoYqoATC8nboZjxv/dYwyIj9KtNGyHmo 5t41tez4chDWShia3ZgssHk2pKkUZ0xazzvvgN2JbVuXJuiyPnJxbYv6P6gSt5jMCjdk kJ7ghf204QvxKPTPofi60mJdvGrNpgg30X0n/d7svmp/o34l/gXxdCOrHX3U4VxQF1M7 rfYMU4aos5hisfiFfmENLo1hJG8D2zULcIMk7rpz0am/f/sjMtWSTx2us27ghronbsn/ F1tfUoA/RpUFaz+Gexj6bXNrbcfpiU42oIHFj/qDOHiqscP1c8+RxVtBbI6lwsSJMwQF o1wA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5318H1uj0kCY/JIXlXaFQscKgkFGbyiohFL0e5YI0Ps3uQuls1M3 GxqdmsxJYZYZRiO3T1BU7kipvFeoN/z1lw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzjmgQmdvTtO+ASkrYCsy5TpiAdzo1S2FT4/MuRlQMe0XwY4w46vpOxSPTl/XmUQTzya7B4vg==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:7783:: with SMTP id v3mr886807pjk.177.1618863548347; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 13:19:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mike-mac.lan (107-182-43-245.volcanocom.com. [107.182.43.245]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x62sm13133804pfb.71.2021.04.19.13.19.07 for <ietf@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 19 Apr 2021 13:19:07 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"?
To: ietf@ietf.org
References: <0b63d094-8c95-409f-282e-86231128f7b5@network-heretics.com> <1C5B7B67-27E5-41F5-89D4-765A407C1FC6@mnt.se> <1d7995d4-f193-2316-9052-d22c2961ac14@network-heretics.com> <8a1b6b42-d085-0b79-19e3-589b4e921b95@mnt.se>
From: Michael Thomas <mike@mtcc.com>
Message-ID: <d0ff2a6d-79ee-8533-f872-c731ecce0224@mtcc.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2021 13:19:06 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.9.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <8a1b6b42-d085-0b79-19e3-589b4e921b95@mnt.se>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/XGu5n5OchUTTRGvMlT84fDgisK4>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2021 20:19:25 -0000

On 4/19/21 1:09 PM, Leif Johansson wrote:
>
> On 2021-04-19 21:46, Keith Moore wrote:
>> On 4/19/21 11:51 AM, Leif Johansson wrote:
>>
>>>> In other words, they can spend all of their time politely explaining in detail why proposals are Bad Ideas, instead of getting useful work done.
>>> Point to where the useful work will be done if we don’t stop this.
>> I don't want to either dismiss your concern (which I share) or sound flippant, but I also wonder where the useful work will be done if we DO stop this.
> I appreciate your attempt to keep sticking to your point and trying to be serious
> about it but... I just don't buy the IETF as the group of brilliant but tortured
> souls who have "snarl" at each other to make themselves heard over the din of "Bad
> Ideas".

What's funny is that several run ins I had that wg chairs shut down just 
went back to their default mode of nothing getting done. In that time, 
they have about a hundred open issues and they were still on issue #1 
which wasn't particularly exciting or important and had been going on 
sporadically the entire time I was there which was a couple months. For 
all I know, they're still stuck on it.

Mike