RE: Simplifying our processes: Conference Calls

"Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo)" <hannes.tschofenig@nsn.com> Tue, 04 December 2012 08:29 UTC

Return-Path: <hannes.tschofenig@nsn.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 170B021F8681 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Dec 2012 00:29:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.45
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.45 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.149, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CZ-+x4Ox46ss for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Dec 2012 00:29:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from demumfd001.nsn-inter.net (demumfd001.nsn-inter.net [93.183.12.32]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46E3021F848B for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Dec 2012 00:29:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from demuprx016.emea.nsn-intra.net ([10.150.129.55]) by demumfd001.nsn-inter.net (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id qB48SxFt020674 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 4 Dec 2012 09:28:59 +0100
Received: from demuexc022.nsn-intra.net (demuexc022.nsn-intra.net [10.150.128.35]) by demuprx016.emea.nsn-intra.net (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id qB48SvQa028743; Tue, 4 Dec 2012 09:28:59 +0100
Received: from FIESEXC035.nsn-intra.net ([10.159.0.25]) by demuexc022.nsn-intra.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Tue, 4 Dec 2012 09:28:58 +0100
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Subject: RE: Simplifying our processes: Conference Calls
Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2012 10:28:08 +0200
Message-ID: <999913AB42CC9341B05A99BBF358718D022E05E1@FIESEXC035.nsn-intra.net>
In-Reply-To: <50BCCE1D.5070001@gmail.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: Simplifying our processes: Conference Calls
Thread-Index: Ac3RcFLtjBhzd4fYSDK6tH6OyK4/6gAiJ3FA
References: <84D0B79A-6D53-47DD-99B8-BC6C18614C74@gmx.net> <50BCCE1D.5070001@gmail.com>
From: "Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo)" <hannes.tschofenig@nsn.com>
To: "ext Brian E Carpenter" <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>, "Hannes Tschofenig" <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 04 Dec 2012 08:28:58.0108 (UTC) FILETIME=[67BC7BC0:01CDD1F9]
X-purgate-type: clean
X-purgate-Ad: Categorized by eleven eXpurgate (R) http://www.eleven.de
X-purgate: clean
X-purgate: This mail is considered clean (visit http://www.eleven.de for further information)
X-purgate-size: 1504
X-purgate-ID: 151667::1354609741-00006291-AE505E3A/0-0/0-0
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2012 08:29:06 -0000

Hi Brian, 


> The point is that we work in public, so the whole community should
> know.

Working group mailing lists are also public. 


> I regularly attend WG meetings where I am not subscribed - it's one of
> the
> side benefits of the week-long meetings - and who's to say that I might
> not
> want to drop into OAuth too?

Are you talking about IETF meetings? I am talking about conference calls here. 

Are you regularly joining conference calls of working groups where you are not subscribed to the mailing lists?

> 
> Suppose I happened to notice (I am making this up) that the foobar WG
> has
> decided to use the IPv6 Flow Label for an unintended purpose? I'd like
> to know if they are going to have a conf call, so that I can explain
> RFC 6437 to them. Otherwise, I have no interest in foobar.
How would you find this out from the announcement of the conference call given that the agenda does not have to announced at the same time? (unless you join every conference call to figure out whether there is something of interest for you?)

Ciao
Hannes