RE: Hotel situation

Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com> Wed, 16 December 2015 17:06 UTC

Return-Path: <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01F7E1A1BFA for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 09:06:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TKbxau_8azoQ for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 09:06:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sjc1-mx02-inside.nominum.com (sjc1-mx02-inside.nominum.com [64.89.234.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 774221A1EB7 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 09:05:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from webmail.nominum.com (cas-03.win.nominum.com [64.89.235.66]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mail.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certificate Authority - G2" (verified OK)) by sjc1-mx02-inside.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 668A4DA0089; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 17:05:10 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mbx-03.WIN.NOMINUM.COM ([169.254.4.19]) by CAS-03.WIN.NOMINUM.COM ([64.89.235.66]) with mapi id 14.03.0224.002; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 09:05:09 -0800
From: Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
To: Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com>, IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: RE: Hotel situation
Thread-Topic: Hotel situation
Thread-Index: AQHROB/nUHQfokN9VUivPUWC1dsmPp7N0xhQgACI9QD//3pLDw==
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2015 17:05:08 +0000
Message-ID: <8D23D4052ABE7A4490E77B1A012B630797A09C09@mbx-03.WIN.NOMINUM.COM>
References: <567192F3.9090506@gmail.com> <8D23D4052ABE7A4490E77B1A012B630797A09BC1@mbx-03.WIN.NOMINUM.COM>, <56719864.8010604@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <56719864.8010604@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [71.233.41.235]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/XUk4FZUFzLrJjpLALNgP59vqYHM>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2015 17:06:20 -0000

> We already have a list of hotels which will.
We do?  This is news to me.   If you mean "hotels that have in the past," I don't think that's any guarantee.

> The closest overflow hotel
> is nearly a mile from the Hilton - how's that going to work
> out for people with limited mobility?

This is an excellent point, and reinforces my belief that you'd be a good IAOC candidate.   I think there's a case to be made that if someone needs special accommodations, there should be a way for them to demonstrate that this is the case and get early access to the conference hotel room block.

> I'm very happy having a
> walk each morning and evening but I'll tell you that it can be
> a huge PITA for breakfast meetings for people not staying
> at the headquarter hotel.

I agree in principle, but it's not clear to me that there's anything that can be done about it.   We do need to trust the folks on the IAOC to take this stuff into account.   When I was an AD I spent a certain amount of energy second-guessing their decisions, but ultimately each decision made sense when I understood the factors that were considered.  Well, except maybe Hawaii, but you can't win them all--I think the pull of history was too much to resist.

> Getting work done should be one
> of the primary considerations, here.

Good point.   Let's get back to work!