Re: Running code, take 2

Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it> Thu, 13 December 2012 13:57 UTC

Return-Path: <vesely@tana.it>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BAE821F8AD1 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 05:57:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.719
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.719 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_IT=0.635, HOST_EQ_IT=1.245, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8VoC5cFVAG4t for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 05:57:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from wmail.tana.it (www.tana.it [62.94.243.226]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F32C21F8ADB for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 05:57:45 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tana.it; s=beta; t=1355407063; bh=bpRqw503LmW1csEQR52LfJDm34lzOTym0nV/RHcoQUY=; l=736; h=Date:From:To:References:In-Reply-To; b=WfeW4ev3uI7OyWay4YZmIk5dA9CBd+LDhQBWTU9vsF7WXjDirlVU0Bzip3/iL81ot f5UcioDqf4U1ITOdl3WS4SwR9zgS+cMUWiZim7QSHPkZ/5wuYURrA5KYtQJlX8GqH2 Is/hIDSYNyktJ9MF28qOMo+Hn/3tZH+vmMw+unXo=
Received: from [172.25.197.158] (pcale.tana [172.25.197.158]) (AUTH: CRAM-MD5 uXDGrn@SYT0/k, TLS: TLSv1/SSLv3,256bits,AES256-SHA) by wmail.tana.it with ESMTPSA; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 14:57:43 +0100 id 00000000005DC031.0000000050C9DED7.00001CA7
Message-ID: <50C9DED7.8060604@tana.it>
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 14:57:43 +0100
From: Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Running code, take 2
References: <50C8DB78.3080905@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <50C8DB78.3080905@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 13:57:46 -0000

On Wed 12/Dec/2012 20:31:04 +0100 Yaron Sheffer wrote:
> 
> I have just published a draft that proposes an alternative to
> Stephen's "fast track". My proposal simply allows authors to document,
> in a semi-standard way, whatever implementations exist for their
> protocol, as well as their interoperability.
> 
> http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-sheffer-running-code-00.txt
> 
> [...]
> 
> I am looking forward to comments and discussion on this list.

As an occasional I-D reader, I'd appreciate "Implementation Status"
sections, including IPR info.  I don't think anything forbids to add
such sections, if the authors wish.  I'd add a count of the number of
I-Ds that actually have it among the experiment's success criteria.