Re: I-D Action: draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt

"Scott O. Bradner" <sob@sobco.com> Wed, 30 March 2016 20:33 UTC

Return-Path: <sob@sobco.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C5CF12D940 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 13:33:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.109
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.109 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RDNS_NONE=0.793, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ak_MEsY-2H6s for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 13:33:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sobco.sobco.com (unknown [136.248.127.164]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 66A1812D832 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 13:33:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sobco.sobco.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABAD31A4B1B6; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 16:33:13 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at sobco.com
Received: from sobco.sobco.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (sobco.sobco.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id I3FuihNDYJAC; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 16:33:12 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [10.0.1.16] (173-166-5-69-newengland.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [173.166.5.69]) by sobco.sobco.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5A9F11A4B1A1; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 16:33:12 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\))
Subject: Re: I-D Action: draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-08.txt
From: "Scott O. Bradner" <sob@sobco.com>
In-Reply-To: <5EC1B680-659E-41A4-840A-611B4EB3D532@ericsson.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2016 16:33:18 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <CF558ED3-ADE9-429E-B321-A1074DE04A63@sobco.com>
References: <20160321144919.31961.89334.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <36BAA6A693139D4BBCB37CCCA660E08A14FB3369@eusaamb101.ericsson.se> <56FC3339.2030801@gmail.com> <5EC1B680-659E-41A4-840A-611B4EB3D532@ericsson.com>
To: Michael Cameron <michael.cameron@ericsson.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/XidvGENEm1zuUTdWGH6d9AD7nHI>
Cc: "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2016 20:33:21 -0000

actually - when 2026 was written that language was recommended by the (many) lawyers who advised us
specifically because it had been tested

Scott

> On Mar 30, 2016, at 4:20 PM, Michael Cameron <michael.cameron@ericsson.com> wrote:
> 
> Hello Brian.  I respectfully disagree.  If the meaning of the phrase has not been litigated, it has not been tested. Regarding your second point, please refer to Gonzalo's earlier comment. For those and other reasons, I continue to believe that these amendments add certainty and clarity to the policy.
> 
> Best, Mike
> 
> 
>> On Mar 30, 2016, at 1:12 PM, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> On 31/03/2016 06:01, Michael Cameron wrote:
>>> ...
>>> To clarify this, I would propose deleting the phrase "reasonably and" in Section 5.1.2.
>> 
>> I would object very strongly to this deletion. We have always said "reasonably and
>> personally known" to make it clear that nobody is expected to go to unreasonable
>> lengths to discover the existence of IPR. For anyone who works for a large company,
>> it is clearly unreasonable for them to be aware of all IPR owned by that company,
>> and this phrase covers that case nicely, especially given that we all participate
>> and contribute here as individuals, even if we happen to use a corporate email
>> address. This phrase has stood the test of time and should not be changed.
>> 
>> ...
>>> ...  Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, acting as a working group chair or Area Director shall constitute "Participating" to the extent such person engages in discussions or review of a Contribution as part of the activities of their relevant working group or area. 
>> 
>> That seems 100% redundant to me. How could anybody possibly interpret the roles
>> of WG Chair or AD as anything other than participating, at moments when they
>> are not contributing (which they often do)?
>> 
>> Regards
>>  Brian
>