IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Realistic responses to DMARC

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Wed, 21 December 2016 17:48 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A97E12989D for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Dec 2016 09:48:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id D9B_lGtedzTh for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Dec 2016 09:48:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qk0-x232.google.com (mail-qk0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 048C5129895 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 21 Dec 2016 09:48:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qk0-x232.google.com with SMTP id t184so88913767qkd.0 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 21 Dec 2016 09:48:50 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=e3t9W75mtFOoxmcD3ohcGHq6x3cecbji+DaY1oi0/lY=; b=MBIwKf0BomUgzs4TgcABak7LOHbbLV6ZMUPjwXFv3ASbs2TB3V6rK0pzMpQmdPLciA rPN7yNtTdfiX84Dc9Y9mTLmlmEcKEAy7W6CXNgZAQUzt3syostdMfqU/exvN6s1MQ+WR +wFUSWF0AvkSV+WGkp2vmJocc7lXDr1woXZxkmf32+G9NL3jUV8P6jKKkQGV2gZz4ICi MTV8QFZ4z87X72k9LZ+yx5UKsUCMMkrZh8WDg+oSweV3DfeVb5P3bDCrhE3TO1v7YJEo +vYc4CeAKQ2CflDTuHcpm0nsTzzE1saonn74SaNQzQh4GX6yVPL4OePisPltEgLgfUbO NGdg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=e3t9W75mtFOoxmcD3ohcGHq6x3cecbji+DaY1oi0/lY=; b=JYKjKmIkkgDI/w8CHG2hdg27UPgMmLltM3hLW1glaBQTSKbtCErF2a3Cc/3aVbDcyZ LxD9exiqj8AwUg8NJD35uqU6MeO4hwtMUySmaD483BWI3OZ2dyOSti3WuRKumzm02Eqm TVNM7f8uKuqyIV8mWqVSJ/LMbr/el4eqlwzh0CfRLCsqcQMJS75fUGrwv6c5ce4fFHra nJtqkym3nIPptTipxNpxJDAXzWlVc7guKxjitrNS04XSovbWEo4CQXN2YHCsmLKPYst4 2HudQHFXyAYBC/uUbKZHx2LsUjIttr2w32opKmx8JyAmtN4+r9X/Slr8EDAc/SQP3C8B gkvA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXJ4g7Ot2g6bI6++OM4A5rx7UFSakaXNVvoiSqsxWcXlJyoeEFrde0VEuSBYjvU4NA==
X-Received: by 10.55.45.131 with SMTP id t125mr5979254qkh.75.1482342530172; Wed, 21 Dec 2016 09:48:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.131] (c-73-167-64-188.hsd1.nh.comcast.net. [73.167.64.188]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y22sm15996048qtb.26.2016.12.21.09.48.48 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 21 Dec 2016 09:48:49 -0800 (PST)
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Message-Id: <BB7F5CFB-0EEC-4EDE-AC1E-79F422351DFD@fugue.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_D0B5475C-FD19-49CB-A7A8-F660EFD9C6A0"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.2 \(3259\))
Subject: Re: Realistic responses to DMARC
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 12:48:48 -0500
In-Reply-To: <CAKHUCzyi2jHekkaWHHOwntRNKcXpWkNfO90TZoSHEiENP9_BHg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Dave Cridland <dave@cridland.net>
References: <9AD6AAD6812D3B9F8379226B@PSB> <20161218022823.8779.qmail@ary.lan> <20161218055834.he6gkupqp5xqlvml@thunk.org> <alpine.OSX.2.11.1612180101460.14297@ary.qy> <20161218065905.5g66jgkvtckydmry@thunk.org> <alpine.OSX.2.11.1612180215450.14970@ary.qy> <20161218222427.7phtcg7mhpypcwnb@thunk.org> <499b8679-37bc-36eb-3ac8-9d99570f42df@dcrocker.net> <alpine.OSX.2.11.1612181857510.19758@ary.qy> <20161219005411.w5tmps5i46lnkydy@thunk.org> <13804.1482113481@obiwan.sandelman.ca> <e9e9efd0-0d83-63f3-4deb-8e0633cc0d17@isode.com> <CAKHUCzyi2jHekkaWHHOwntRNKcXpWkNfO90TZoSHEiENP9_BHg@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3259)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/XqO0JvNRMh4iC0oBKcIKdXSC50U>
Cc: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>, IETF general list <ietf@ietf.org>, Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 17:48:52 -0000

On Dec 21, 2016, at 12:38 PM, Dave Cridland <dave@cridland.net> wrote:
> Do you even know what this list is *for*?

Yes.   It’s for seeking consensus during IETF last calls, and discussing general IETF business.

I suspect that wasn’t the answer you were going for, though… :)

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email