Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-nfsv4-lfs-registry-02

[Alexey Melnikov <[e-mail]>]

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on 
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at 
<http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments 
you may receive.

Document:  draft-ietf-nfsv4-lfs-registry-02
Reviewer: Alexey Melnikov
Review Date: 2015-02-11
IETF LC End Date: 2015-02-16
IESG Telechat date: N/A.

Summary: This draft is nearly ready for publication as a standard track 
RFC (with nits).

Major issues:
Minor issues:

In Section 4:

"LSF" is used for the first time without being expanded. I suggest you 
introduce the abbreviation in the terminology section.

In Section 5:

Label Description: - what is the allowed character set for this field? 
Is it ASCII? Is it UTF-8 with some restrictions?

 >Status:  A short ASCII text string indicating the status of an entry
 >       in the registry.  The status field for most entries should have
 >       the value "active".  In the case that a label format selection
 >       entry is obsolete, the status field of the obsoleted entry should
 >       be "obsoleted by entry NNN".

What is entry NNN? Is it a document reference (e.g. An RFC)? Is it 
possible to obsolete without such entry?

In Section 5.3 - is it possible to update a label description document 
without requesting a new label? For example if changes are editorial and 
don't significantly affect label syntax and model.


Nits/editorial comments: