IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Proposed IETF 95 Date Change

Olaf Kolkman <olaf@NLnetLabs.nl> Thu, 02 August 2012 16:50 UTC

Return-Path: <olaf@NLnetLabs.nl>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59AA221E80A9 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Aug 2012 09:50:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZmvyU1EQ4L3l for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Aug 2012 09:50:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from open.nlnetlabs.nl (open.nlnetlabs.nl [IPv6:2001:7b8:206:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE07111E8151 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 2 Aug 2012 09:50:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [IPv6:2001:df8::96:c4e3:36f1:5927:3f07] ([IPv6:2001:df8:0:96:c4e3:36f1:5927:3f07]) (authenticated bits=0) by open.nlnetlabs.nl (8.14.5/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q72GocBH097949 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 2 Aug 2012 18:50:42 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from olaf@NLnetLabs.nl)
X-DKIM: OpenDKIM Filter v2.5.2 open.nlnetlabs.nl q72GocBH097949
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=nlnetlabs.nl; s=default; t=1343926244; bh=fP0XoSk8gkKfDSgOjpNDu2uiEFQ8Wjfj0DbmagfuEnI=; h=From:Subject:Date:References:To:In-Reply-To; b=dHQWmrJF5E9QDDdSSlMGJTS2jJ7cKhys47nmqkI2bUT0ZOYNf5I/bfE8Y5ePTjDaa P2wxWkOpISbELS02MaCN3c4zYWDV4RGJyhQzXMVvY7fFFN28TvtYzZtnopF0RfeQ68 jureWwm9wMDPfdwU8cX17A2h+fEb9X4EhideqUh0=
From: Olaf Kolkman <olaf@NLnetLabs.nl>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_3AA6B8C8-73C0-402F-97D5-75C19070294F"
Message-Id: <8A32C4E1-6585-4708-8A1B-46F615265E13@NLnetLabs.nl>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.0 \(1485\))
Subject: Re: Proposed IETF 95 Date Change
Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2012 09:50:39 -0700
References: <20120802164551.20569.2082.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: ietf@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <20120802164551.20569.2082.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1485)
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (open.nlnetlabs.nl [IPv6:2001:7b8:206:1::53]); Thu, 02 Aug 2012 18:50:43 +0200 (CEST)
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2012 16:50:51 -0000

On Aug 2, 2012, at 9:45 AM, IETF Administrative Director <iad@ietf.org> wrote:

> The IAOC is proposing IETF 95 be rescheduled for 20 - 25 March 2016 and would like 
> feedback on those dates before making a decision.  


Support.


--Olaf

v2.27.8 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status