Re: Montevideo statement

Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> Mon, 07 October 2013 23:05 UTC

Return-Path: <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28ABF21E80CF for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Oct 2013 16:05:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.575
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.575 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.024, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UIrKtMg47IRX for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Oct 2013 16:05:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p130.piuha.net (p130.piuha.net [193.234.218.130]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DD8C21E80D0 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 7 Oct 2013 16:05:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDD052CC5F; Tue, 8 Oct 2013 02:05:09 +0300 (EEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at piuha.net
Received: from p130.piuha.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (p130.piuha.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2ow1Hu0IH7Lw; Tue, 8 Oct 2013 02:05:09 +0300 (EEST)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2a00:1d50:2::130]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A3A12CC48; Tue, 8 Oct 2013 02:05:09 +0300 (EEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.5 \(1508\))
Subject: Re: Montevideo statement
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
In-Reply-To: <20131007225129.GA572@laperouse.bortzmeyer.org>
Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2013 02:05:09 +0300
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <4B3BF00B-0916-4EED-A73C-A0EB8B2A78FD@piuha.net>
References: <ABCF1EB7-3437-4EC3-B0A8-0EDB2EDEA538@ietf.org> <20131007225129.GA572@laperouse.bortzmeyer.org>
To: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1508)
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2013 23:05:16 -0000

> 
> This wording is surprising. It looks like it is the revelations that
> undermined confidence, and not the NSA actions. I would prefer
> something like, to avoid shooting the messenger:

Of course :-) We meant that the loss of privacy causes concern, not the revelations.

Jari