IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Presentation vs. Discussion sessions

Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com> Sun, 02 December 2012 19:18 UTC

Return-Path: <moore@network-heretics.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DC2A21F8464 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 2 Dec 2012 11:18:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7EoiOENb9vDD for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 2 Dec 2012 11:18:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com (out4-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F377421F843F for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 2 Dec 2012 11:18:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.mail.srv.osa [10.202.2.42]) by gateway1.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix) with ESMTP id A56C220EDD for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 2 Dec 2012 14:18:14 -0500 (EST)
Received: from frontend1.nyi.mail.srv.osa ([10.202.2.160]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 02 Dec 2012 14:18:14 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; s=smtpout; bh=3+Bn55FC2xUzkqCzcVRew/ u3Ad0=; b=LXBMPOF0oFeoh9qDZbh6x6u/K5EV1dn3+Ydp+9qc9bupX4g3UHOmXJ Rd0lKqwOgtYETg4vOrDlvb9nCb3xY9d5qnOBIVKE42b7dcf/j6MZMg0FeMiBzFQt 9zccGTj24Y8giA5OYebP7LoJZkzizx7ddAgzr7wiEJu0I3SW0cAiU=
X-Sasl-enc: QfoksxMhGiCfdLBmCnwuTwB9P0t4G1inhd6FitIcwGt4 1354475894
Received: from [192.168.1.20] (unknown [65.16.145.177]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 136028E0573; Sun, 2 Dec 2012 14:18:13 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <50BBA96F.3080401@network-heretics.com>
Date: Sun, 02 Dec 2012 14:18:07 -0500
From: Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Presentation vs. Discussion sessions
References: <CAC4RtVCogYS4tmY1LLi0C-E+B+di2_wTD0N-=AZrVR7-A8Mz+A@mail.gmail.com> <50B68612.7080107@dcrocker.net> <50B693ED.7000609@stpeter.im> <50B696B0.30904@qti.qualcomm.com> <CAC4RtVAG+pKSQMwPyB6GJ7jxJM4hNpU81Yt8he6ZsEMrg_rTbQ@mail.gmail.com> <00c001cdce7a$d9fa6490$8def2db0$@asgard.org> <50B7EA5D.2030803@qti.qualcomm.com> <50BA18B8.3090306@network-heretics.com> <p06240609cce032de76ff@dhcp184-48-45-14.hroa.orl.wayport.net> <m2obidvuv7.wl%randy@psg.com> <p0624060ccce0b42ffc47@dhcp184-48-45-14.hroa.orl.wayport.net> <50BB10FF.6090105@gmail.com> <50BB5A69.40107@network-heretics.com> <17CDABC9DDB6E00CE9A36B15@JcK-HP8200.jck.com> <50BB6B61.4040304@network-heretics.com> <3717C2CC54EB3B1A8E3E8EEA@JcK-HP8200.jck.com> <50BB6FC8.8040907@network-heretics.com> <50BB8DA8.5070406@joelhalpern.com> <AEDAFA38A99E8B0E926BAC0F@JcK-HP8200.jck. com> <50BB96C4.2080908@network-heretics.com> <50BB98B0.2060100@gmail.com> <50BB9FE6.5000000@network-heretics.com> <50BBA0EA.3070204@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <50BBA0EA.3070204@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Dec 2012 19:18:21 -0000

On 12/02/2012 01:41 PM, Melinda Shore wrote:
> On 12/2/12 9:37 AM, Keith Moore wrote:
>> Perhaps roughly the first 2(?) days of an IETF meeting could be largely
>> devoted to presentation sessions, and the remainder of the time to
>> discussion sessions.
> I think you'd end up with 2 days of presentation sessions and the
> remainder of the meeting given over to presentation sessions.
>
In which case the ADs should fire the chairs on the spot.

Keith

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email