Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Community Feedback

Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 05 November 2019 19:18 UTC

Return-Path: <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09CFA120A56 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Nov 2019 11:18:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.997
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.997 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id of2J3PAQjQrz for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Nov 2019 11:18:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-oi1-x22d.google.com (mail-oi1-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CC94B120A42 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Nov 2019 11:18:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-oi1-x22d.google.com with SMTP id n16so18617579oig.2 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 05 Nov 2019 11:18:17 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=284uUB4oLMPcoiMf9ajpT4ixSten1XAiq+QdQQLhcTs=; b=f3OQca4jMgpkaGqmPwNttmfyR4TxgN1kNficBXHja0L4oOnrLSutJKPj6xn76D+f0q sWXdc3rwGh56aVcRs/fcE2GzMpSvZlGNmuK2KildiG3Jh5OE5jC60wnJpByH3aGsUQoF NWP1ljXGs7m1yjQH7+YkPjAvvdsKI5RKPMq82A15/xB2CzDZllYZL5fyprinOTya8MhU w8e7DRNfOAYoUnyFUPOKDuNPFcOGhYrGTHwWi/2CQPxbQV0NCfx3VvtaiaBufMgOk0T5 /S1mXsrrxe3+6ldC2wuJ47/ywDoyQDIYcnR9SWCD2x1MSgGxC2rfPJHwK4RCJZuitNWc Nsfw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=284uUB4oLMPcoiMf9ajpT4ixSten1XAiq+QdQQLhcTs=; b=W/IqHx5jQwBhOxC6+slKZ4aOrOBpgDB1NjHRl6jQqh9UL4SB05Aev9jJ7CJDF6itNI 72FtTS/UBTaZf8zrrqg8vXkoXifuGPyEGJownqaic8lYYrRfQXoilelOpvjeLVEK1kvZ i0PNwkjQ1d1rgifTvwAhj13+AxX9NW+Eb4K0hHO/9hsTf4naQEaCXLzWrUGmxDnWh8HQ IvmP99BArt1T44fsJ3fRQ4YRsGtejVYqyK2rC0b7hBCVKxJWGhT8xm2f9PYIKo9hGKXM jnbj5s8JvYod1PUZe/xRFxRBcC0HG1drz5xYE4SEwyL1zb0inGuCWB12inkSy6w/LHr4 34HQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVceOzXk06r1jrqfjzE2sLWmMiEXgcu4c6Gwx+olDBwQG/Tc35z m88Gp3ni3QViV0jcb8u8UKb4d3bh9TeAx39XJ/WnIM6a
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzSGREOLqW0IBQtUZ1kFBGFmV6IgGHRz6jePEs8d7LiBxG3WeepVZtD43giFBqsuQsVr4HfbCrvXHMMGjwgJss=
X-Received: by 2002:aca:d509:: with SMTP id m9mr495622oig.164.1572981497129; Tue, 05 Nov 2019 11:18:17 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <7601008E-0E4A-42DD-9D5D-667A7603CE38@akamai.com> <20191105184940.DF6AEE6A701@ary.local> <327DD4FA-D5C8-4CC2-A849-73D6CCCC69D3@akamai.com>
In-Reply-To: <327DD4FA-D5C8-4CC2-A849-73D6CCCC69D3@akamai.com>
From: Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2019 14:17:39 -0500
Message-ID: <CAHbuEH5aZxZ_Dum_+aJ2h_u3H+=5DD2E5w3jsiw3UQ_+bkybRg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Community Feedback
To: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
Cc: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000005ff14305969e4ba5"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/XwRe6q5wTFTzQOUbkIsPQuKecKU>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2019 19:18:28 -0000

On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 2:00 PM Salz, Rich <rsalz@akamai.com>; wrote:

> >    I wouldn't think that adding people would help much since a lot of the
>     work isn't divisible.  ADs traditionally read all of the drafts, not
>     just the ones in their area.
>
> Does every AD read all the drafts?  I don't know.  But changing the
> process to say one AD from each area would reduce the load.
>
Some divide it up.  Pete & Barry had a split.  If there was a big load,
Stephen would start from one end of the list and I'd start from the other.
We both mostly wanted to 'read' them all though.


> > The number of communication paths grows as the square of
>     the number of people.
>
> Second time this has been mentioned.  There's a huge difference between
> information-theory and practice.
>
> >    The way to have less work is to publish fewer RFCs, or perhaps shorter
>     RFCs.
>
> That is certainly *A* way, but not *THE* way.
>
>
>

-- 

Best regards,
Kathleen