Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-tsvwg-iana-ports-09.txt> (Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) Procedures for the Management of the Service Name and Transport Protocol Port Number Registry) to BCP
Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com> Mon, 28 March 2011 12:12 UTC
Return-Path: <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C0A73A67DF; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 05:12:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.465
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.465 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.134, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8jWslAYJm0r1; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 05:12:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rufus.isode.com (rufus.isode.com [62.3.217.251]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 080503A6845; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 05:12:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [130.129.20.248] (dhcp-14f8.meeting.ietf.org [130.129.20.248]) by rufus.isode.com (submission channel) via TCP with ESMTPA id <TZB7pAADL1cM@rufus.isode.com>; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 13:14:28 +0100
Message-ID: <4D907B90.2090709@isode.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 14:14:08 +0200
From: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050915
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
To: IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-tsvwg-iana-ports-09.txt> (Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) Procedures for the Management of the Service Name and Transport Protocol Port Number Registry) to BCP
References: <20110118212603.5733.34489.idtracker@localhost> <B88A8A82-9C4A-40AC-89AF-F177260760F7@cisco.com> <4D413827.7040407@ericsson.com> <B4F0B107-4D84-43A5-A091-B6877D24C23B@cisco.com> <4D46B3B9.4050804@ericsson.com> <755A9333-6960-4BCC-B996-3775E76B5D9E@cisco.com> <4D4920F0.1070204@ericsson.com> <49CDF352-D900-4883-8D67-19172DBC8474@cisco.com> <4D5B4B98.4060704@vpnc.org> <6AA482E6-924C-4981-9E7F-69AD8EE3DD6F@cisco.com> <4D5B4D86.3020102@stpeter.im> <4D5BB0E8.5000503@isode.com>
In-Reply-To: <4D5BB0E8.5000503@isode.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: iesg@ietf.org, tsvwg@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 12:12:53 -0000
Alexey Melnikov wrote: > Peter Saint-Andre wrote: > >> Agreed, thanks to Paul for the proposed text. >> >> On 2/15/11 9:02 PM, Cullen Jennings wrote: >> >>> Paul's text is much better than mine. That was what I trying to get >>> at. >> > Agreed, I will add this as an RFC Editor's note. > >>> On Feb 15, 2011, at 8:59 PM, Paul Hoffman wrote: >>> >>>> On 2/15/11 7:34 PM, Cullen Jennings wrote: >>>> >>>>> I propose some text for the draft near the bottom of this >>>>> email.... For the user ports the document should have some text >>>>> along the lines of: >>>>> >>>>> There is not IETF consensus on when it is appropriate to use a >>>>> second port for a secure version of protocol therefor the export >>>>> reviewer should not reject a request for a second port to run a >>>>> secure variant of the protocol over. >>>> >>>> That feels close, but too prescriptive. Also, the requests are >>>> usually for a protocol with two ports, not a later request for a >>>> second port. How about: >>>> >>>> There is not IETF consensus on when it is appropriate to use a >>>> second port for a secure version of protocol. Therefore, an expert >>>> reviewer should not reject a proposal for a protocol that uses a >>>> second part to run a secure variant for the sole reason that it >>>> is using two ports. >>> After discussing this new text with IESG and some participants of the TSVWG, it became clear that while there is clear agreement for adding the first sentence quoted above ("There is no IETF consensus..."), there is no clear cut consensus for adding the second sentence ("Therefore, an expert reviewer should not reject a proposal"). After even further discussions with proponents of this text, with editors, IANA, etc., the proposal is to strike the second sentence, i.e. only the following sentence is going to be added to the document: There is no IETF consensus on when it is appropriate to use a second port for an insecure version of protocol. The IESG is already alerted when there are problems with IANA registrations, so the requirement being removed is not needed. If people have problems with this change, please send your objections by 4pm Prague time on Wednesday, March 30th, as I would like to approve the document before my IESG term ends.
- Last Call: <draft-ietf-tsvwg-iana-ports-09.txt> (… t.petch
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-tsvwg-iana-ports-09.tx… Magnus Westerlund
- Re: [port-srv-reg] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tsvwg-i… Lars Eggert
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-tsvwg-iana-ports-09.tx… Cullen Jennings
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-tsvwg-iana-ports-09.tx… Lars Eggert
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-tsvwg-iana-ports-09.tx… Magnus Westerlund
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-tsvwg-iana-ports-09.tx… Carsten Bormann
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-tsvwg-iana-ports-09.tx… Lars Eggert
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-tsvwg-iana-ports-09.tx… IETF Chair
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-tsvwg-iana-ports-09.tx… Paul Hoffman
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-tsvwg-iana-ports-09.tx… Joel Jaeggli
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-tsvwg-iana-ports-09.tx… t.petch
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-tsvwg-iana-ports-09.tx… Lars Eggert
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-tsvwg-iana-ports-09.tx… Joe Touch
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-tsvwg-iana-ports-09.tx… Michelle Cotton
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-tsvwg-iana-ports-09.tx… ned+ietf
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-tsvwg-iana-ports-09.tx… t.petch
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-tsvwg-iana-ports-09.tx… Cullen Jennings
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-tsvwg-iana-ports-09.tx… Joe Touch
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-tsvwg-iana-ports-09.tx… Cullen Jennings
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-tsvwg-iana-ports-09.tx… Cullen Jennings
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-tsvwg-iana-ports-09.tx… Cullen Jennings
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-tsvwg-iana-ports-09.tx… Cullen Jennings
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-tsvwg-iana-ports-09.tx… Joe Touch
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-tsvwg-iana-ports-09.tx… Joe Touch
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-tsvwg-iana-ports-09.tx… Paul Hoffman
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-tsvwg-iana-ports-09.tx… Joe Touch
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-tsvwg-iana-ports-09.tx… David Conrad
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-tsvwg-iana-ports-09.tx… Michelle Cotton
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-tsvwg-iana-ports-09.tx… Lars Eggert
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-tsvwg-iana-ports-09.tx… Magnus Westerlund
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-tsvwg-iana-ports-09.tx… Paul Hoffman
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-tsvwg-iana-ports-09.tx… Lars Eggert
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-tsvwg-iana-ports-09.tx… Paul Hoffman
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-tsvwg-iana-ports-09.tx… Cullen Jennings
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-tsvwg-iana-ports-09.tx… Eliot Lear
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-tsvwg-iana-ports-09.tx… Cullen Jennings
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-tsvwg-iana-ports-09.tx… Paul Hoffman
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-tsvwg-iana-ports-09.tx… Magnus Westerlund
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-tsvwg-iana-ports-09.tx… Michelle Cotton
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-tsvwg-iana-ports-09.tx… Joe Touch
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-tsvwg-iana-ports-09.tx… Joe Touch
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-tsvwg-iana-ports-09.tx… Joe Touch
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-tsvwg-iana-ports-09.tx… Cullen Jennings
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-tsvwg-iana-ports-09.tx… Cullen Jennings
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-tsvwg-iana-ports-09.tx… Cullen Jennings
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-tsvwg-iana-ports-09.tx… Eliot Lear
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-tsvwg-iana-ports-09.tx… Joe Touch
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-tsvwg-iana-ports-09.tx… Eric Rescorla
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-tsvwg-iana-ports-09.tx… Eliot Lear
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-tsvwg-iana-ports-09.tx… Eric Rescorla
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-tsvwg-iana-ports-09.tx… Magnus Westerlund
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-tsvwg-iana-ports-09.tx… ned+ietf
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-tsvwg-iana-ports-09.tx… Eric Rescorla
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-tsvwg-iana-ports-09.tx… Paul Hoffman
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-tsvwg-iana-ports-09.tx… Cullen Jennings
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-tsvwg-iana-ports-09.tx… Cullen Jennings
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-tsvwg-iana-ports-09.tx… Joe Touch
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-tsvwg-iana-ports-09.tx… Joe Touch
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-tsvwg-iana-ports-09.tx… Eric Rescorla
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-tsvwg-iana-ports-09.tx… Joe Touch
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-tsvwg-iana-ports-09.tx… Eric Rescorla
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-tsvwg-iana-ports-09.tx… Joe Touch
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-tsvwg-iana-ports-09.tx… Eliot Lear
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-tsvwg-iana-ports-09.tx… Sam Hartman
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-tsvwg-iana-ports-09.tx… Joe Touch
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-tsvwg-iana-ports-09.tx… Sam Hartman
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-tsvwg-iana-ports-09.tx… Joe Touch
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-tsvwg-iana-ports-09.tx… Eric Rescorla
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-tsvwg-iana-ports-09.tx… Magnus Westerlund
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-tsvwg-iana-ports-09.tx… t.petch
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-tsvwg-iana-ports-09.tx… t.petch
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-tsvwg-iana-ports-09.tx… Joe Touch
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-tsvwg-iana-ports-09.tx… Joe Touch
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-tsvwg-iana-ports-09.tx… Chris Benson
- RE: Last Call: <draft-ietf-tsvwg-iana-ports-09.tx… Christian Huitema
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-tsvwg-iana-ports-09.tx… Bob Hinden
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-tsvwg-iana-ports-09.tx… Alexey Melnikov
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-tsvwg-iana-ports-09.tx… Alexey Melnikov
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-tsvwg-iana-ports-09.tx… Cullen Jennings
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-tsvwg-iana-ports-09.tx… Paul Hoffman
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-tsvwg-iana-ports-09.tx… Cullen Jennings
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-tsvwg-iana-ports-09.tx… Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-tsvwg-iana-ports-09.tx… Cullen Jennings
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-tsvwg-iana-ports-09.tx… Alexey Melnikov
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-tsvwg-iana-ports-09.tx… Sam Hartman
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-tsvwg-iana-ports-09.tx… t.petch
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-tsvwg-iana-ports-09.tx… Alexey Melnikov
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-tsvwg-iana-ports-09.tx… Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-tsvwg-iana-ports-09.tx… Lars Eggert
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-tsvwg-iana-ports-09.tx… Joe Touch
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-tsvwg-iana-ports-09.tx… Magnus Westerlund
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-tsvwg-iana-ports-09.tx… Michelle Cotton
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-tsvwg-iana-ports-09.tx… Eliot Lear
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-tsvwg-iana-ports-09.tx… Markku Kojo