Re: Confidentiality notices on email messages
Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it> Fri, 15 July 2011 14:55 UTC
Return-Path: <vesely@tana.it>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B803021F85C6 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 Jul 2011 07:55:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.836
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.836 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.117, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_IT=0.635, HOST_EQ_IT=1.245, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GN8sQg72+AWE for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 Jul 2011 07:55:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wmail.tana.it (mail.tana.it [62.94.243.226]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9D0221F85B5 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 15 Jul 2011 07:55:44 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tana.it; s=test; t=1310741743; bh=WFaJJmLTXkycuuRQHgXqXw8SDsC3V3fHb7E/sZ1W9kA=; l=1239; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:References:In-Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=ctZF3jU4Rlln35c6IcUnFCvr2ON02OxFPV2nJj5uE9ew3I672CEKaMGkQwPPQLGyL j+jS1SGj7KtwkONzAX+UX7ou6+FcmlTkFB3CQFtG9Tuvx6jCT+rk8ryTRleldQkm/g bduGFsQwHxVNbcF1/rljVNCKXtPLLDw8TsL6tYbI=
Received: from [172.25.197.158] (pcale.tana [172.25.197.158]) (AUTH: CRAM-MD5 515, TLS: TLS1.0,256bits,RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1) by wmail.tana.it with ESMTPSA; Fri, 15 Jul 2011 16:55:43 +0200 id 00000000005DC045.000000004E2054EF.00005D93
Message-ID: <4E2054EE.7080108@tana.it>
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2011 16:55:42 +0200
From: Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110616 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.11
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Confidentiality notices on email messages
References: <20110714014835.9480.qmail@joyce.lan> <4E1F0B2C.3070401@tana.it> <2A06ADAE-70E2-4D0C-9809-66E01943B68E@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <2A06ADAE-70E2-4D0C-9809-66E01943B68E@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2011 14:55:49 -0000
On 14/Jul/11 18:37, Will McAfee wrote: > On Jul 14, 2011, at 11:28 AM, Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it> wrote: >> One can sign the "Sensitivity" header field defined by RFC 2156. It >> can have the values "Personal" / "Private" / "Company-Confidential". >> >> However, I received some messages bearing a confidentiality notice but >> missing this field entirely. Even the TC system above could hardly >> cope with such inconsistent settings. Do notices still retain any >> legal value in such cases? > > They don't have legal value, period. It is still an argument that one can bring before a court, e.g. when claiming damage for unauthorized disclosure of confidential data. We all know that misaddressing can (and does) happen. Stating that a message is confidential might be worth in certain circumstances. See http://www.out-law.com/page-5536 The point is that the semantic status of a message should be set by the sender, properly. It does not scale to leave it up to the recipients to determine whether any possible notice is harmless, inapplicable, or out of context. Laws may allow it, protocols less so. -- *NOTICE* Access to this text is restricted to people having the right to do so. -rwxrwxrwx
- Re: Confidentiality notices on email messages Marc Petit-Huguenin
- Confidentiality notices on email messages Barry Leiba
- Re: Confidentiality notices on email messages Jorge Contreras
- Re: Confidentiality notices on email messages Barry Leiba
- Re: Confidentiality notices on email messages Randall Gellens
- Re: Confidentiality notices on email messages J.D. Falk
- Re: Confidentiality notices on email messages Hector Santos
- Re: Confidentiality notices on email messages Huub van Helvoort
- Re: Confidentiality notices on email messages John C Klensin
- Re: Confidentiality notices on email messages Michael Richardson
- Re: Confidentiality notices on email messages Andrew Sullivan
- Re: Confidentiality notices on email messages Marc Petit-Huguenin
- Re: Confidentiality notices on email messages Alessandro Vesely
- Re: Confidentiality notices on email messages Marc Petit-Huguenin
- Re: Confidentiality notices on DNS messages Bert
- Re: Confidentiality notices on email messages Dave Cridland
- Re: Confidentiality notices on email messages Marc Petit-Huguenin
- Re: Confidentiality notices on email messages Martin Rex
- Re: Confidentiality notices on email messages John Levine
- Re: Confidentiality notices on email messages John Levine
- RE: Confidentiality notices on email messages Michel Py
- Re: Confidentiality notices on email messages Michael Richardson
- Re: Confidentiality notices on email messages Dave CROCKER
- Re: Confidentiality notices on email messages Michael Richardson
- Re: Confidentiality notices on email messages Will McAfee
- Re: Confidentiality notices on email messages Joel Jaeggli
- Re: Confidentiality notices on email messages Alessandro Vesely
- Re: Confidentiality notices on email messages Will McAfee
- Re: Confidentiality notices on email messages Randall Gellens
- Re: Confidentiality notices on email messages John C Klensin
- Re: Confidentiality notices on email messages Barry Leiba
- RE: Confidentiality notices on email messages Worley, Dale R (Dale)
- Re: Confidentiality notices on email messages Olaf Kolkman
- Re: Confidentiality notices on email messages Alessandro Vesely
- Re: Confidentiality notices on email messages Wes Hardaker
- Re: Confidentiality notices on email messages David Morris
- Re: Confidentiality notices on email messages ned+ietf
- Re: Confidentiality notices on email messages Donald Eastlake
- Re: Confidentiality notices on email messages John Levine
- RE: Confidentiality notices on email messages Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: Confidentiality notices on email messages Nathaniel Borenstein
- Re: Confidentiality notices on email messages Harald Alvestrand
- Re: Confidentiality notices on email messages Wes Hardaker
- Re: Confidentiality notices on email messages Richard Kulawiec
- Re: Confidentiality notices on email messages ned+ietf
- Re: Confidentiality notices on email messages Nathaniel Borenstein
- Re: Confidentiality notices on email messages Harald Alvestrand