Re: Comments for <I-D of Publishing the "Tao of the IETF" as a Web Page>

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Wed, 04 July 2012 15:59 UTC

Return-Path: <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B45121F861C for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Jul 2012 08:59:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -104.774
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-104.774 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-2.175, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id b81ew3qbc7ZZ for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Jul 2012 08:59:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net [213.165.64.23]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 93A1B21F8611 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Jul 2012 08:59:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 04 Jul 2012 15:59:18 -0000
Received: from p54BB2CAC.dip.t-dialin.net (EHLO [192.168.178.36]) [84.187.44.172] by mail.gmx.net (mp041) with SMTP; 04 Jul 2012 17:59:18 +0200
X-Authenticated: #1915285
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19vKeE1rRRvnXvVBnqnOCLfO3ojbdqTIZRQCJZ89R cV9f/LIZ9PPbcW
Message-ID: <4FF4684F.9030603@gmx.de>
Date: Wed, 04 Jul 2012 17:59:11 +0200
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120614 Thunderbird/13.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
Subject: Re: Comments for <I-D of Publishing the "Tao of the IETF" as a Web Page>
References: <CADnDZ89XGzmqRTL61rc9MSYRJCjs3BgwSDcM=J+_sKvoR1muEw@mail.gmail.com> <CADnDZ88jqzUpFwkyr9rtGQsoq3fNea_j-g2wpfz2081VrUakZg@mail.gmail.com> <CADnDZ89fxJo_YbVMrVr+-Q_-nF72W9iG9vZapZNV+1O0gckpow@mail.gmail.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20120620072437.0ad66a00@resistor.net> <CADnDZ8-kndVu9=4hG=hKPuTu960gEorac2w5gO6XJaL96gGrJA@mail.gmail.com> <4FE37DF1.2080407@gmail.com> <F96B6701-F6FF-41C1-BF81-81A00C76C450@vigilsec.com> <4FF45805.60702@gmx.de> <3CAEDB8A-46A5-4055-B0F4-BC0984463866@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <3CAEDB8A-46A5-4055-B0F4-BC0984463866@vigilsec.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
Cc: IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Jul 2012 15:59:10 -0000

On 2012-07-04 16:52, Russ Housley wrote:
> Julian:
>
> Do you object to http://www.ietf.org/tao-archive for the old version of the Tao?
>
> Russ

No, I was just trying to understand *why* the archive can't be at 
<http://www.ietf.org/tao/archive>.

Best regards, Julian