Re: term for 3rd RTG AD

Allison Mankin <allison.mankin@gmail.com> Wed, 07 January 2015 18:14 UTC

Return-Path: <allison.mankin@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77F511A008A for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Jan 2015 10:14:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wrm-Pk6lyVmF for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Jan 2015 10:14:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qc0-x236.google.com (mail-qc0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c01::236]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 433651A19EF for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 7 Jan 2015 10:10:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qc0-f182.google.com with SMTP id r5so1242664qcx.41 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 07 Jan 2015 10:10:54 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=eBCWJHizVnKsGY8cgfh24Wrrge/TVInbsAKWoO+86cE=; b=beMy9PSCUSia3kl4Sp5g+qjxJiw4473VaN2KMFWghIUv1fNb6F6pyQe0zV/w0TnN+V wDmvR613+CPTHL+aezv2oYWK07JOr5D52Emq5UC4kN0GdbkY0y7s7hsQvZEkqgwFSeFr UnD5kEAsuS+wj+Y8pCCKJfRh0yMJK/smnZim3C+x5S22lGfkvZR3+7DRZJ0qFlcZXGx3 W49p2G0wI2S/1Ok7nnJvWfluDTPWjtu7elsWl1+smicSa+rwrWLFi5RPlpXrGFwerDrm KUPl14FcRu4gQAkvAm45xMMYXOLVGmGtC2ChQvM3YJPhewLPrOEtTG9BnX5po5leggTt 3t0w==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.224.15.78 with SMTP id j14mr7269705qaa.0.1420654254519; Wed, 07 Jan 2015 10:10:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.96.144.71 with HTTP; Wed, 7 Jan 2015 10:10:54 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <24548.1419894559@sandelman.ca>
References: <5614C286-0CD2-4DAD-A846-510EE38D1B9A@ietf.org> <549DB615.90408@gmail.com> <20141226222726.GB27054@verdi> <24548.1419894559@sandelman.ca>
Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2015 13:10:54 -0500
Message-ID: <CAP8yD=tWwm9FmgMLfQm4A9YtrPaXcqWe1hEMp=dVS3S-rtbfCA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: term for 3rd RTG AD
From: Allison Mankin <allison.mankin@gmail.com>
To: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bdc81cc307cf8050c13d84b
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/YQelhMv3jFDnZZ1CwKtxTjT8R8A
Cc: IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2015 18:14:33 -0000

Michael,

I support a two year term for the extra Routing AD - that's a good amount
of time for getting good at the AD job, whereas one year is too short, and
three is (as others said) a lot of commitment, as well as being a problem
if the person loses interest or some such issue.

Allison

On 29 December 2014 at 18:09, Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
wrote:

>
> John Leslie <john@jlc.net> wrote:
>     >    (Nonetheless, I support the IESG choosing to experiment with three
>     > RTG ADs for one year.)
>
> I hadn't thought yet as to the term and rotation by which the 3 RTG ADs
> would
> get re-evaluated.  RFC3777 (and bis) say that the terms shall be such that
> "half the IESG" gets evaluated each year.
> (If the writeup explained that, I missed it)
>
> As such, it would likely be best if the new RTG AD was a either 1 year or 3
> year term simply so that it's opposite the IETF Chair term.  However, any
> additional flipping around due to the new area would change that anyway.
>
> --
> Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>ca>, Sandelman Software Works
>  -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
>
>
>
>