Re: I-D Action: draft-iab-ccg-appoint-process-00.txt

Dave Crocker <dcrocker@gmail.com> Fri, 25 November 2016 23:05 UTC

Return-Path: <dcrocker@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5334A12943F for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Nov 2016 15:05:27 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id z4-Fh8PXr-Yp for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Nov 2016 15:05:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pg0-x22d.google.com (mail-pg0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c05::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0DF7A12941A for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 25 Nov 2016 15:05:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pg0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id x23so33505026pgx.1 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 25 Nov 2016 15:05:26 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:subject:to:references:reply-to:organization:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=5qNa/h7ssdLmP4bKw6dx/l5rJT5M1eyBKD/7kwVIkq4=; b=QRHFY1QHto96/19KVur+6bDy/T5ec0gK3gs1RZ7iI26Ngu6JvDv/SBec0pCekVhX6n 60anypA+8Y5cTbxRN9ZvjxSevQMmsMNtvhfdqW1k4fNShYsEVeiUSMBapf75qdTqCDUc rI4megqxcmNcA9Z9868fhrd02JVJGZxVtARiBkzTI6j4qgdhVboZlYKCcHNyrO5EWxEH VKOYfxtUm/zrzyjPj15VWae8+X8GnLrekhF3rjM0zogRdNaVyztdtjb3YCzhQ3xfGQVJ 4o09qCEQckcpcEwqu9Jksx1bbz8wp/vuzzRpRChMHPRnqvrB3CVf3iflRLcj5M+m3386 se8w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:subject:to:references:reply-to:organization :message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=5qNa/h7ssdLmP4bKw6dx/l5rJT5M1eyBKD/7kwVIkq4=; b=YGJw3cNRTedhaK7Xs4akJI5CTnHRv5dslf/9L7tuV7B8IXIeCDaDjoJ2S1qB4D/nuF w5lhtZT+qgwo09v3zeC8V4mkpLT7iyUGnnzUZpKGUx1PCiqw0Fs7iodvf5q6YWgAni+X 3tWEt8aLIq/8gmgfDAT/xbPAG73q5Dzs123CaovAJJkIQrWGdjLKpvQxFzOcThS2uz5l MUc3ssxLkj+bZGZqnot6u+uqWTjcPwHs67lz6N7BuPxwYLdysWroAOBZH2WtSZk4Mzb6 XyJKbfDwZeY7DxpALOpfXKGnkpNv1vnyCCN9kvoeqN41Ogy3+/CdXUd5WOroQqd3cnh1 2rGw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC02v8ItOvXawYxQ32gT0eUFiaFuEeQEEvN76Q18+DdTNawCdz6OSvFngJjWFUm/opQ==
X-Received: by 10.98.201.196 with SMTP id l65mr10282112pfk.116.1480115125280; Fri, 25 Nov 2016 15:05:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [172.16.1.240] ([45.24.116.177]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w125sm70072655pfb.8.2016.11.25.15.05.24 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 25 Nov 2016 15:05:24 -0800 (PST)
From: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@gmail.com>
X-Google-Original-From: Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net>
Subject: Re: I-D Action: draft-iab-ccg-appoint-process-00.txt
To: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>, ietf@ietf.org
References: <148009401131.22717.9124100512985996998.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <99a16936-f0c5-6add-cbff-95f0d3164cad@gmail.com> <20161125215513.GG68855@mx2.yitter.info>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
Message-ID: <02115aa3-497d-c1aa-1afa-076243476e6a@dcrocker.net>
Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2016 15:05:21 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20161125215513.GG68855@mx2.yitter.info>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/YTIyV4L8Kzr06pk40HN75C3YoCg>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
Reply-To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2016 23:05:27 -0000

On 11/25/2016 1:55 PM, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 26, 2016 at 10:49:29AM +1300, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
>> Could you add something about the expectation being to arrange staggered
>> terms, so that a simultaneous turnover of all three members can be avoided?
>> This doesn't have to be a rule, just an intention.
>
> The IAB's plan is to put that intention into its internal policies,
> instead, on the grounds that it will be obvious to any competent IAB
> that complete turnover is undesirable without tying a future IAB's
> hands if something dramatic happens.  Is it enough that you know that?


Andrew,

While I suspect that what you describe is sufficient in practical terms, 
operationally, there is nonetheless such a long-established practice of 
including this bit of procedural requirement into a foundational 
document like this that it seems quite odd not to have it.  There.

d/
-- 

   Dave Crocker
   Brandenburg InternetWorking
   bbiw.net