Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt> (The .onion Special-Use Domain Name) to Proposed Standard

George Michaelson <ggm@algebras.org> Tue, 21 July 2015 05:36 UTC

Return-Path: <ggm@algebras.org>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BB9D1ACED8 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Jul 2015 22:36:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.978
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.978 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id v1bHJC_oPomE for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Jul 2015 22:36:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qg0-f46.google.com (mail-qg0-f46.google.com [209.85.192.46]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 87F6D1ACED7 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 Jul 2015 22:36:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by qgeu79 with SMTP id u79so27357229qge.1 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 Jul 2015 22:36:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=e/VYQFJXuVaFv1kd0kM7rMrUA9+NAgFS2lhSmIIm0h8=; b=Cv4nTWv2CR20OwmoIj98/ZUHiFCV8LnHbzrK6dPH0fte/54UCVY5vRCQnu5nd0iM4f 5I90GfS8NjOePr8PikCJWhadKVYrUp/0s2sEn/Vuk7O0BAa+fzgEZDIED8EIkGUuQqNP zGEaCxr9SjVUA1sjn1/FP7uwmQYTRCbF9u3mtu0E9NG6bU1204QzUtQ9SbxseWd6re/x xEmJe+RDQGfg6hRyGuoOBvnnl3R9p2RSmLtatsv9QHrrApJ2ikeYuSWDOZfWKhidubLZ LFDofunvHAAqvW0y/V+CUqX7yWMd1JLc5TSb9GHJQUAeWQ+EbuB/qTm7pDLrkoi/1Pm2 Pcyg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQncRipcKct6SLJ8H9rhQ+FbpRrROeBQsRJ8aKokmz8C5b8J2gUAnMc8tJes4Fd9QtycCm+j
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.55.40.230 with SMTP id o99mr22541474qko.28.1437456973808; Mon, 20 Jul 2015 22:36:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.96.8.97 with HTTP; Mon, 20 Jul 2015 22:36:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Originating-IP: [2001:67c:370:136:2862:cee4:e50e:4b0]
In-Reply-To: <BF3E292D-7A3C-48D5-9B87-63B9675D098F@nominum.com>
References: <CD5AD7A8CCF5852BB1CE0AC1@JcK-HP5.jck.com> <DCB0DEDD-9B0F-4103-BA28-4265F20F9BAA@nominum.com> <DFB8A13C069E919B80105032@JcK-HP5.jck.com> <BF3E292D-7A3C-48D5-9B87-63B9675D098F@nominum.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2015 07:36:13 +0200
Message-ID: <CAKr6gn0r8VShe==CMSA=AkOH02SgXUpFARd8eiE=eP_tRS5kOA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt> (The .onion Special-Use Domain Name) to Proposed Standard
From: George Michaelson <ggm@algebras.org>
To: Ted Lemon <ted.lemon@nominum.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1144a4c84ddc2d051b5c08e5"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/YV38Elj9APBLOo4l_4A4jbjA1JI>
Cc: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>, IETF Discussion Mailing List <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2015 05:36:16 -0000

SOCKS works with a shim. there is no .SOCKS domain to make SOCKS work.

shims work.

url tor://{http://.....} would work as a nesting function

ssh tor://{user@host ssh part} might work

so you have shim, and you have wrap.

wrap is every app changes. shim is no app changes.

notice neither of them needed DNS tricks.


On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 1:44 AM, Ted Lemon <ted.lemon@nominum.com> wrote:

> On Jul 20, 2015, at 2:20 PM, John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com> wrote:
>
> More generally and with the understanding that
> it doesn't actually help us make progress, it would be plausible
> to answer your question above with "CLASSes work fine, it is
> URLs that are broken and don't work".
>
>
> OK, let’s run with that for a bit.   Suppose we change URLs.   What about
> hostnames for ssh?   What about for ftp?   What about for every other place
> where hostnames are used?
>
>