Re: Useful slide tex (was - Re: English spoken here)

Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com> Sun, 02 December 2012 18:06 UTC

Return-Path: <moore@network-heretics.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E32A821F859D for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 2 Dec 2012 10:06:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id O0smPJKCm8S5 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 2 Dec 2012 10:06:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com (out4-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC66C21F84D5 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 2 Dec 2012 10:06:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.mail.srv.osa [10.202.2.45]) by gateway1.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E53D20B5D for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 2 Dec 2012 13:06:07 -0500 (EST)
Received: from frontend1.nyi.mail.srv.osa ([10.202.2.160]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 02 Dec 2012 13:06:07 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; s=smtpout; bh=GsgCR9qEIeGK4N/02M3CsC RlbEk=; b=YZDVO0G81nmU9Jgh7NKyWQQmnUytMbhvdCHgseUxhQgwi7nsEFuo2/ HbkdIIAKBe0hRTWbPJCI3OIOh0Qb6/xs9S4OGUgVUvA6igCWubcB8FRh0gy5+e61 uYb51RD9wn4uTyfZqyw2Mt0vQt1wwmdG7UwG4ou5oY+YauW8HMgeU=
X-Sasl-enc: RkuAb7ePuGvaj0k3+NJwKBU83udC47mabifqzflS9E0a 1354471567
Received: from [192.168.1.20] (unknown [65.16.145.177]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id D59078E05D2; Sun, 2 Dec 2012 13:06:06 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <50BB9888.8080906@network-heretics.com>
Date: Sun, 02 Dec 2012 13:06:00 -0500
From: Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Useful slide tex (was - Re: English spoken here)
References: <CAC4RtVCogYS4tmY1LLi0C-E+B+di2_wTD0N-=AZrVR7-A8Mz+A@mail.gmail.com> <50B5C839.4060909@gmail.com> <59924CD37D50616BA8EB8EF7@JcK-HP8200.jck.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20121128023905.0afdcde0@resistor.net> <50B683C4.2030503@stpeter.im> <50B68612.7080107@dcrocker.net> <50B693ED.7000609@stpeter.im> <50B696B0.30904@qti.qualcomm.com> <CAC4RtVAG+pKSQMwPyB6GJ7jxJM4hNpU81Yt8he6ZsEMrg_rTbQ@mail.gmail.com> <00c001cdce7a$d9fa6490$8def2db0$@asgard.org> <50B7EA5D.2030803@qti.qualcomm.com> <50BA18B8.3090306@network-heretics.com> <p06240609cce032de76ff@dhcp184-48-45-14.hroa.orl.wayport.net> <m2obidvuv7.wl%randy@psg.com> <p0624060ccce0b42ffc47@dhcp184-48-45-14.hroa.orl.wayport.net> <50BB10FF.6090105@gmail.com> <50BB5A69.40107@network-heretics.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20121202073741.0ac80c68@resistor.net> <A1D3CE1A0AA345FE0ECB6697@JcK-HP8200.jck.com> <50BB92FB.5040904@dcrocker.net> <50BB950A.9000408@network-heretics.com> <50BB9699.6070404@dcrocker.net>
In-Reply-To: <50BB9699.6070404@dcrocker.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Dec 2012 18:06:13 -0000

On 12/02/2012 12:57 PM, Dave Crocker wrote:
>
>
> On 12/2/2012 9:51 AM, Keith Moore wrote:
>> I think you're missing the point.   The core problem is the overuse of
>> presentations, and presentation tools, for working group face to face
>> meeting time which is better suited for discussion.
>
>
> stop blaming the tool.  focus on the folks doing the speaking.
The tool is a big part of the problem.  The tool encourages a certain 
style of interaction that is generally inappropriate for face to face 
working group meetings.

Of course, strictly speaking, the focus is on the people who are using 
the tool, and more broadly, on using the habit and community expectation 
that keeps encouraging people to use a poorly suited tool.  But they're 
using the tool poorly precisely because it's very difficult to use that 
tool well for that purpose.   A different toolset, (e.g. pens and paper 
and overhead cameras coupled to projectors), would likely produce better 
results if that toolset did not encourage laziness in preparing 
materials to facilitate discussion.

Keith