IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: AD Sponsorship of draft-moonesamy-recall-rev

S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> Sun, 21 April 2019 08:29 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@elandsys.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A33E120226; Sun, 21 Apr 2019 01:29:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=opendkim.org header.b=IKHxuuXL; dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=elandsys.com header.b=C0QHBBqG
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5_vaf2IQxQ_o; Sun, 21 Apr 2019 01:29:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65E431201C0; Sun, 21 Apr 2019 01:29:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from DESKTOP-K6V9C2L.elandsys.com ([197.226.53.132]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id x3L8T4rf027325 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 21 Apr 2019 01:29:14 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1555835358; x=1555921758; bh=88QcF+2TXGWRSqDSohc2m2Hy9EILyrsOjrpmFq6V0uI=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=IKHxuuXLYLBetQ9ul1gokOjxPTQVMLmPEZElzRAiMdt7bY4O7TnyV4/JNWALVeILN Up/PCU7N4MeVhNLM6ySLwXHKxwgUXZOXJww0fHku3iD6m8kqZWQcOYUsME4fIFIPjp ATIwWYuPZinG76DyzEdlvXn5MWsOdfI45xh2J974=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1555835358; x=1555921758; i=@elandsys.com; bh=88QcF+2TXGWRSqDSohc2m2Hy9EILyrsOjrpmFq6V0uI=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=C0QHBBqGqQQczWXPVsmcqVXX2zrlz+rNlLlGJMjbQS2GS59GZAqiJY3lCtcZahMSk abevhKRq5nMR+C9kT9P2FoDPhaeIdfkuUO7sOl2nETBA0rBToXoX7tw/3YLYJ2TjNv p/IXsmsWl2tQhz4tubeVcwSFtKn+t8N6hFNBoVs8=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20190420213606.0ca86360@elandnews.com>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2019 01:23:46 -0700
To: Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>, ietf@ietf.org
From: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
Subject: Re: AD Sponsorship of draft-moonesamy-recall-rev
Cc: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>, John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>, IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAKKJt-dCgFyDXdYD8aM1LSo15YpmtwEnCqW=N1G0wyx5LCC=xg@mail.g mail.com>
References: <6.2.5.6.2.20190405085139.0d5c39b0@elandnews.com> <54510B49-175B-4CE6-9319-1F9A4803940E@cooperw.in> <6.2.5.6.2.20190418115734.0dffb680@elandnews.com> <CAKKJt-dCgFyDXdYD8aM1LSo15YpmtwEnCqW=N1G0wyx5LCC=xg@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/Z09hcDszlSDen6HNwjE7CfRHufM>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2019 08:29:27 -0000

Hi Spencer,
At 06:57 PM 20-04-2019, Spencer Dawkins at IETF wrote:
>Well, an IESG did exactly that in the early 2000s, resulting in 
>https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3774.
>
>We have addressed a minority of the problems we identified a decade 
>and a half ago, but ISTM that taking a look at RFC 3774 and seeing 
>what remains to be fixed, and whether it's worth fixing, might be a 
>FABulous place to start ...

The current administration [1] has not expressed any interest in the 
recall-rev draft.  If it is interested in that RFC, it could talk 
with the Internet Architecture Board (IAB) to find proponents willing 
to tackle some other set of the minority of problems.

Regards,
S. Moonesamy

1. The word has a different meaning in some countries.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email