Re: [arch-d] Draft IAB conflict of interest policy
Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 09 January 2020 14:54 UTC
Return-Path: <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84092120944; Thu, 9 Jan 2020 06:54:55 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2bKpQLlAPyMB; Thu, 9 Jan 2020 06:54:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ed1-x52c.google.com (mail-ed1-x52c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::52c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1078F120934; Thu, 9 Jan 2020 06:54:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ed1-x52c.google.com with SMTP id t17so5839226eds.6; Thu, 09 Jan 2020 06:54:52 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=SgLF/Z9na83qPxU942H2jQv1zQDvCIftCTdUkuLAcv8=; b=e/Abp9dZ4g+a6JtVjveYoeEe8J7lQneXJcgoopLqS9GoCr/QLUK18Uityibv1Ry0dX dT+i1Qzt4hx9bRnULXfHEXOGY/chWBNVSZCNYJODpoTiop0rM07oy/I0439SVYiV13L3 rEobLpnD23y5MUkNxUNygkU6H2fVG/dZj2sJUz/RsC9kN6pPUNsR5QjZo3yccLS1EN1n 8KTYR21vrXgGqJ8vEoAsjGnz69rbdPkzmF2j0unZuXRKzT7soFfMDihpPORdHQiKMFdH zsDukCixvpJOh4713gWCO3jc0yvbhAnubGTp4xx/LnXZzJGXl6Uq6lFS6uSCpTTX/Vgk SbwQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date :message-id:subject:to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=SgLF/Z9na83qPxU942H2jQv1zQDvCIftCTdUkuLAcv8=; b=QdPmrfLHFsJl31zPXtVzlyXRlheRKkaOuwX8urCPeHutRfWTcNZpHMUcaKhY0+9EOw U+FA4wHiQDJAKQRCBthY7BHDMEQCembJ5Bp7IO3yb93ADBa9mwUf27m0xvpcy3+Kaqfs 10iZfwDFYkceWQbp5X4Fabo1321/eiyWVBF6T9bvT68xjYqW5n28DhM4fLRSQMvVpn/G uQrl/oYXfYjur3AWPRe6WTdv9wOVixEMNnO2zy8JcUujjKwMIWPwQSCihsMOlZV4O6VX +r0+29emdq0rYileZjIJMI0F8bHRpclpqok1e27v/Q3wRq/l7XtUIYa7ZV6r/XdUTMtG ld6A==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUayzLw3BOIOk+ZSzwvHkaNPms2wXk/yFFWnYXaDyJV/NPGGavP GXOaW9hRmW7XUWlyo/ZX3ncIQH+j35uETySp4ZXVkw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwpqaP5n5EDsA8bXpUDVondEU4+5Jtva/Ph7br06QvfBS6zTLHvyHOc4R1A2oYOgNTkBqZFSofCqVnCLdIQeWs=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:1777:: with SMTP id da23mr11706125edb.292.1578581691423; Thu, 09 Jan 2020 06:54:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 1058052472880 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Thu, 9 Jan 2020 06:54:50 -0800
From: Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4e888f0a-a1e8-df72-cbbc-9a2e2f0d0d05@iab.org>
References: <4e888f0a-a1e8-df72-cbbc-9a2e2f0d0d05@iab.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2020 06:54:50 -0800
Message-ID: <CAMMESsxzMQNK2pCaOYyf7gviOz4Xy54_U9qSnv2S_zbc-E49Vg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [arch-d] Draft IAB conflict of interest policy
To: architecture-discuss@ietf.org, IAB Chair <iab-chair@iab.org>, iab@iab.org, ietf@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/Z27zUcbo6Mg9PqhtBD7gwRfIDcg>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2020 14:54:57 -0000
On January 8, 2020 at 6:15:13 PM, IAB Chair wrote: Hi! > This policy covers the nomcom-selected Internet Architecture Board (IAB) > members and ex-officio members (collectively, “Covered Individuals”). This > policy has no impact on any other participants in IAB activities, for > instance liaisons to and from the IAB or IAB program members. I have two questions: (1) Why are the liaison members of the IAB not included as Covered Individuals? rfc2850 treats both ex-officio and liaison members in about the same way -- the only distinction that I could see is that "an ex-officio position may be held by a full member" (§1.2). Given that all the other expectations for both are the same, I would like to understand why the liaison members are not included in the policy if they can participate in the IAB discussions. (2) Liaison managers (to other organizations) represent the interests of the IETF, should they be subject to a similar COI policy? Maybe it is not appropriate to include them in this specific policy, but I didn't find anything in rfc4052 related to this point. Thanks! Alvaro.
- Draft IAB conflict of interest policy IAB Chair
- Re: [arch-d] Draft IAB conflict of interest policy Stewart Bryant
- Re: [arch-d] Draft IAB conflict of interest policy John C Klensin
- Re: [arch-d] Draft IAB conflict of interest policy Eric Rescorla
- Re: [arch-d] Draft IAB conflict of interest policy Stewart Bryant
- Re: [arch-d] Draft IAB conflict of interest policy Alvaro Retana
- Re: Draft IAB conflict of interest policy Joe Touch
- Re: Draft IAB conflict of interest policy Warren Kumari
- Re: Draft IAB conflict of interest policy Stephen Farrell
- Re: Draft IAB conflict of interest policy Richard Barnes
- Re: Draft IAB conflict of interest policy Ben Campbell
- Re: [arch-d] Draft IAB conflict of interest policy Salz, Rich
- Re: Draft IAB conflict of interest policy Salz, Rich
- Re: [arch-d] Draft IAB conflict of interest policy Joe Touch
- Re: [arch-d] Draft IAB conflict of interest policy Eric Rescorla
- Re: [arch-d] Draft IAB conflict of interest policy Ben Campbell
- Re: [arch-d] Draft IAB conflict of interest policy Livingood, Jason
- Re: Draft IAB conflict of interest policy Livingood, Jason
- Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [arch-d] Draft IAB conflict of… Deen, Glenn (NBCUniversal)
- Re: [arch-d] Draft IAB conflict of interest policy Ben Campbell
- Re: [arch-d] Draft IAB conflict of interest policy Scott O. Bradner
- Re: [arch-d] Draft IAB conflict of interest policy Livingood, Jason
- Re: [arch-d] [EXTERNAL] Re: Draft IAB conflict of… Mary Barnes
- Re: [arch-d] Draft IAB conflict of interest policy Joe Touch
- Re: [arch-d] Draft IAB conflict of interest policy Bernard Aboba
- Re: [arch-d] Draft IAB conflict of interest policy Eric Rescorla
- Re: [arch-d] Draft IAB conflict of interest policy Joe Touch
- Re: [arch-d] Draft IAB conflict of interest policy Marc Blanchet
- Re: [arch-d] Draft IAB conflict of interest policy Eliot Lear (elear)
- Re: [arch-d] Draft IAB conflict of interest policy Pete Resnick
- Re: [arch-d] Draft IAB conflict of interest policy Stewart Bryant
- Re: Draft IAB conflict of interest policy Cullen Jennings
- Re: [arch-d] Draft IAB conflict of interest policy Bernard Aboba
- Re: Draft IAB conflict of interest policy Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Draft IAB conflict of interest policy Christian Huitema
- Re: Draft IAB conflict of interest policy Brian E Carpenter
- [arch-d] Draft IAB conflict of interest policy Guntur Wiseno Putra
- Re: Draft IAB conflict of interest policy Michael StJohns
- Re: Draft IAB conflict of interest policy Michael StJohns
- Re: Draft IAB conflict of interest policy Joel M. Halpern
- Re: Draft IAB conflict of interest policy Rob Sayre
- RE: Draft IAB conflict of interest policy Roni Even (A)
- Re: Draft IAB conflict of interest policy Eliot Lear (elear)
- Re: [arch-d] Draft IAB conflict of interest policy Toerless Eckert
- Re: [arch-d] Draft IAB conflict of interest policy Robert Raszuk
- Re: [arch-d] Draft IAB conflict of interest policy Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [arch-d] Draft IAB conflict of interest policy Randy Bush
- Re: [arch-d] Draft IAB conflict of interest policy Salz, Rich
- Re: [arch-d] Draft IAB conflict of interest policy Randy Bush
- Re: [arch-d] Draft IAB conflict of interest policy Salz, Rich
- Re: Draft IAB conflict of interest policy Jared Mauch
- Re: [arch-d] Draft IAB conflict of interest policy Toerless Eckert
- Re: [arch-d] Draft IAB conflict of interest policy Toerless Eckert
- Re: Draft IAB conflict of interest policy Randy Bush
- Re: Draft IAB conflict of interest policy Jay Daley
- ISOC and PIR board analogies (Was Re: Draft IAB c… Andrew Sullivan
- Re: ISOC and PIR board analogies (Was Re: Draft I… Randy Bush
- Re: ISOC and PIR board analogies (Was Re: Draft I… Randy Bush
- Re: ISOC and PIR board analogies (Was Re: Draft I… Jay Daley
- Re: [arch-d] Draft IAB conflict of interest policy John C Klensin
- Re: ISOC and PIR board analogies (Was Re: Draft I… John C Klensin
- Re: ISOC and PIR board analogies (Was Re: Draft I… Livingood, Jason