From nobody Sat Aug 15 06:24:35 2020
Return-Path: <dharkins@lounge.org>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC3B83A0E15
 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 15 Aug 2020 06:24:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.85
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.85 tagged_above=-999 required=5
 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.949, SPF_PASS=-0.001]
 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
 by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id 8JBXEdEKUvdl for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>;
 Sat, 15 Aug 2020 06:24:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from www.goatley.com (www.goatley.com [198.137.202.94])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3110C3A0E14
 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 15 Aug 2020 06:24:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from trixy.bergandi.net
 (cpe-76-176-14-122.san.res.rr.com [76.176.14.122])
 by wwwlocal.goatley.com (PMDF V6.8 #2433)
 with ESMTP id <0QF30B2C4X8U51@wwwlocal.goatley.com> for ietf@ietf.org; Sat,
 15 Aug 2020 08:24:31 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from Dans-MacBook-Pro.local ([69.12.173.8])
 by trixy.bergandi.net (PMDF V6.7-x01 #2433)
 with ESMTPSA id <0QF300F2EX8ANA@trixy.bergandi.net> for ietf@ietf.org; Sat,
 15 Aug 2020 06:24:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 69-12-173-8.static.dsltransport.net ([69.12.173.8] EXTERNAL)
 (EHLO Dans-MacBook-Pro.local) with TLS/SSL by trixy.bergandi.net
 ([10.0.42.18]) (PreciseMail V3.3); Sat, 15 Aug 2020 06:24:11 -0700
Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2020 06:24:29 -0700
From: Dan Harkins <dharkins@lounge.org>
Subject: Re: Terminology discussion threads
In-reply-to: <20200814225218.GP92412@kduck.mit.edu>
To: ietf@ietf.org
Message-id: <54ac47b7-8de0-926c-c15f-5cc2f6cc9210@lounge.org>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-language: en-US
Content-transfer-encoding: 8BIT
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:68.0)
 Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0
X-PMAS-SPF: SPF check skipped for authenticated session
 (recv=trixy.bergandi.net, send-ip=69.12.173.8)
X-PMAS-External-Auth: 69-12-173-8.static.dsltransport.net [69.12.173.8] (EHLO
 Dans-MacBook-Pro.local)
References: <6AA0BCBB-D95B-4036-B94D-5E79E7B94D75@ietf.org>
 <F15E387D-9FDC-4A76-8002-78B85F6D16BE@nohats.ca>
 <CABcZeBNitWbdPO4Y2WfCzjy10Z+s27px6cGT1uRHmtGHa5iX+Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <ed227fd5-3277-d7a9-f93d-b259944009d6@huitema.net>
 <7ec6f897-fd3e-8a22-cf6e-ea457d745982@lounge.org>
 <20200814191721.GK92412@kduck.mit.edu>
 <CABmDk8m5AmzPr9f+hpcMq=Z8zt958nQFEHeh_Wkt3F7Jo5TkXw@mail.gmail.com>
 <20200814225218.GP92412@kduck.mit.edu>
X-PMAS-Software: PreciseMail V3.3 [200813] (trixy.bergandi.net)
X-PMAS-Allowed: system rule (rule allow header:X-PMAS-External noexists)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/Z3ADtEPdeb0DMoKV3AFHdFjB0M0>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>,
 <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>,
 <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2020 13:24:34 -0000


On 8/14/20 3:52 PM, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
> You're quite right that "prominent" is poorly chosen; my apologies and
> thank you for noting it.
>
> I was attempting to use it as a shorthand to convey two parallel concerns:
>
> - if the people who think that their leaving is noteworthy are leaving, who
>    else is leaving for the same reasons but not bothering to make an
>    announcement?
>
> - if the experts on a given topic (the "people who wrote the book", if you
>    will forgive the expression) are not in the room, how do we know that the
>    right people have looked at a given topic/issue/question to ensure that the
>    details of that topic have been fully considered?
>
> I do recognize that this last point bears significant similarity to your
> comment about "community members whose opinions are more important than
> others", but in this case I think my concerns can be characterized more as
> regarding the breadth of expertise available rather than giving particular
> enhanced weight to the opinions of some community members in the abstract.
> The first point serves to augment the concerns, of course.

   I guess while we do not believe in kings, presidents, and voting we most
definitely do have a nomenklatura.

   Dan.

p.s. I think if you polled the lesser members of the IETF you'd find a few
published authors-- i.e. "people who wrote the book."

