Re: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Checklist

[Keith Moore <[e-mail]>]

John C Klensin wrote:

> 	(iii) The IETF has indicated enough times that domain
> 	names, not literal addresses, should be used in both
> 	protocols and documents that doing anything else should
> 	reasonably require clear and strong justification.

I take issue with that as a general statement.  There are plenty of 
applications where the ability to use literal addresses on an occasional 
basis is quite useful - e.g. for diagnostic purposes (of various kinds) 
or in a pinch when DNS is broken or not set up correctly.  Furthermore 
addresses are precise where domain names are not.

To remove the capability to use address literals is to cripple our 
protocols.

(your other three points seemed fine to me)

Keith
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
[e-mail]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf