Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
"Livingood, Jason" <Jason_Livingood@comcast.com> Wed, 14 April 2021 21:35 UTC
Return-Path: <Jason_Livingood@comcast.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C49023A20C6 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Apr 2021 14:35:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.799
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.799 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=comcast.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id h3gil7wod1T0 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Apr 2021 14:35:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0a-00143702.pphosted.com (mx0a-00143702.pphosted.com [148.163.145.77]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 634B13A20B9 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Apr 2021 14:35:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0156891.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-00143702.pphosted.com (8.16.0.43/8.16.0.43) with SMTP id 13ELG7Bk025999; Wed, 14 Apr 2021 17:35:25 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.com; h=from : to : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-id : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=20190412; bh=ol/9Yfqg5WoDsCxx+kZPtH1mO7DSNY6vBjqVCls7zE0=; b=N3byIYJl9k+RIEwHTrVmwEt6fQrZj/uYxOfbvjy+azyPtR7wc1YsvLJSq9Tp/PrM7XTd 5BHvQTM8FMp4B9fIQKbblzLeI+iw4t8jvnkUohJhBG1h5LHgaUddegjRUXWH7xLWk2/n Wk2v+OzuY1uiBFBTYXgOfdqdq5JLQXGYRidpm2WZkLptLCS5EeP5kP078tw1DD3lwdNH 6ffiOI5VL394lq8coxN/q+LJvDM9r1U4KvCP82uOljfxk77u5rUkrc5wY0Qh4/jPAGTC 6E44qwqbHYluNoWou/naXFdtWSBVC+Co+SdwFg8nsoYu0bf/7BzIWxz/0mL6fdU5UbGM QQ==
Received: from copdcexc34.cable.comcast.com (dlppfpt-as-1p.slb.comcast.com [96.99.226.135]) by mx0a-00143702.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 37wcc0uvjm-11 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 14 Apr 2021 17:35:25 -0400
Received: from copdcexc33.cable.comcast.com (147.191.125.132) by copdcexc34.cable.comcast.com (147.191.125.133) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.2106.2; Wed, 14 Apr 2021 15:35:21 -0600
Received: from COPDCEXEDGE01.cable.comcast.com (96.114.158.213) by copdcexc33.cable.comcast.com (147.191.125.132) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.2106.2 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 14 Apr 2021 15:35:21 -0600
Received: from NAM10-MW2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (104.47.55.106) by webmail.comcast.com (96.114.158.213) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Wed, 14 Apr 2021 15:35:20 -0600
Received: from MN2PR11MB4287.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:208:189::17) by BL0PR11MB3443.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:208:6c::26) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.4020.16; Wed, 14 Apr 2021 21:35:19 +0000
Received: from MN2PR11MB4287.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::c80d:3887:55ee:e89a]) by MN2PR11MB4287.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::c80d:3887:55ee:e89a%5]) with mapi id 15.20.4042.016; Wed, 14 Apr 2021 21:35:19 +0000
From: "Livingood, Jason" <Jason_Livingood@comcast.com>
To: Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>, The IETF List <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
Thread-Topic: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
Thread-Index: AQHXMVR/CTNQ3QCcA0eASHMDg58oyKq0TdmAgAALhgD//+0LgA==
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2021 21:35:19 +0000
Message-ID: <8B1BADF2-0817-4000-9A75-0CF3D8853A6E@cable.comcast.com>
References: <20210413200535.BF29C72D2919@ary.qy> <7ac5ecf5-734e-7f63-a000-dea09cec1d0a@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> <5198680E-3555-48FF-9FF5-77105DBC06D7@akamai.com> <52e31d01-c5cf-489f-aa9c-cea327ef03d5@dogfood.fastmail.com> <A3F46396-E636-4B35-AAEA-80FD45242F4A@cisco.com> <44E11446-F3B3-431C-BBF7-FA827E016833@bluepopcorn.net> <20210414184309.GQ9612@localhost>
In-Reply-To: <20210414184309.GQ9612@localhost>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/16.47.21031401
authentication-results: cryptonector.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;cryptonector.com; dmarc=none action=none header.from=cable.comcast.com;
x-originating-ip: [2601:41:200:d70:bd94:7863:316:30ec]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: c2f50820-374e-4ad0-e4f2-08d8ff8d33b1
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: BL0PR11MB3443:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BL0PR11MB3443522099C65F01FA912FF8C74E9@BL0PR11MB3443.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:8882;
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: 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
x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:MN2PR11MB4287.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFS:(4636009)(39860400002)(366004)(396003)(136003)(376002)(346002)(2906002)(186003)(6506007)(33656002)(4744005)(86362001)(64756008)(53546011)(6486002)(478600001)(66446008)(66556008)(83380400001)(71200400001)(2616005)(8676002)(8936002)(66946007)(38100700002)(6512007)(66476007)(110136005)(76116006)(122000001)(316002)(5660300002)(45980500001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102;
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: 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
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
arc-seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=CPxtYa8kD65sIpcvEp4IorJsNjWLzFW9wQD3YZR27lo9wzQdd+pB2UKzU899g2JKEDLyVU+gRXqVo12fDTz/KIZbAFZg2kMLABvwZRc/B5h7+JXAA38wEn7gcjYxpM1liQUtock/mNf/vTvqq0Fy7XgutmRemlJ43+JiiThMJicFTaeyw8sDHhBdAEKsIeJ2ZiN+3X/w5r9QXvuPzy6MicKCmlDhF9fE2co4KPNw1sk8EIxU5uvCMxGHalVu5f/7rBh3MEis5ye61QlYmLwRy+WpI1DDwNrX101UwtXBk3cSoebi6FcN9LF4ZUGJP8yI8uaibae4aLvYgedxvfcivw==
arc-message-signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=LPlHh64pEtO+Rtt+GuNHknwcbT3eYeMFNKrDWJbvU4w=; b=Pfeyw6+9rX29NcWt8N79b/eNy+FhRHHjMrWsle5n6NdKOwh2VquSbHEWHf6q+/QwsmFc92z7UPGQk2hg39M/HvUcSpJ/tVnfktR9kQdPjgJMCeOTAbEaiTaJsbKHS3Rm0XYwdLmbu7AamfapILpSKcpCwq2IJFcfpa5h0FjmyQIeaDEnpes+7xpf9pqulVkz2LsTB1tj7H+1XB7ZEEGNfCYUO18K+msPqYj3C1DLoSsuDc9W1qK3T0MxazaD5Rj3mzkJ4ynImXTP5a9xMW5T8BXY4flSx98DPU4s3+nefvMNFqhvsnflMXkc0MeRL2dyP9t0fwubULdVL4RP2ULsiQ==
arc-authentication-results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cable.comcast.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cable.comcast.com; dkim=pass header.d=cable.comcast.com; arc=none
x-ms-exchange-crosstenant-authas: Internal
x-ms-exchange-crosstenant-authsource: MN2PR11MB4287.namprd11.prod.outlook.com
x-ms-exchange-crosstenant-network-message-id: c2f50820-374e-4ad0-e4f2-08d8ff8d33b1
x-ms-exchange-crosstenant-originalarrivaltime: 14 Apr 2021 21:35:19.3944 (UTC)
x-ms-exchange-crosstenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-ms-exchange-crosstenant-id: 906aefe9-76a7-4f65-b82d-5ec20775d5aa
x-ms-exchange-crosstenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
x-ms-exchange-crosstenant-userprincipalname: gs6GTeY8UCycb8QQ4KebYfwBScX92NYjXMzE5Ky3pK36RPbBmK+W7gP7O+ALq/FkDZ1pjSxrW2ujantmWFi7Y5zoMPzYwJTxQesk3FBJpyg=
x-ms-exchange-transport-crosstenantheadersstamped: BL0PR11MB3443
x-originatororg: cable.comcast.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <E5768322C5240E4CB09C313BAD908552@namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Forward AAETWC
X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: LX89OA8VhxDBs5vNJMi5XwPxBRku11-D
X-Proofpoint-GUID: LX89OA8VhxDBs5vNJMi5XwPxBRku11-D
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.391, 18.0.761 definitions=2021-04-14_12:2021-04-14, 2021-04-14 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Reason: safe
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/Z9ECe0PxvmXE8iHkk85UxDSASBU>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2021 21:35:33 -0000
On 4/14/21, 2:44 PM, "ietf on behalf of Nico Williams" <ietf-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of nico@cryptonector.com> wrote: > Fernando has pointed out repeatedly that ISOC used to have a sponsorship program for participants from economically disadvantaged countries, and that this program has been terminated. [JL] The IETF has a Diversity & Inclusivity sponsorship program (https://www.ietf.org/about/support/#diversity-inclusivity) that provides support in the manner you suggest. IIRC it was developed just as COVID hit so it thus far has only been used to support waivers for online meetings. From that page: "...providing a path to sustained engagement for those who would otherwise face difficulties participating in the IETF. The IETF’s Diversity and Inclusivity sponsorship supports fee waivers to lower economic barriers to meeting participation, and the IETF Systers program which offers women participants the opportunity to connect, share, and learn with each other."
- Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective T… John Levine
- Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective T… Masataka Ohta
- Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective T… Salz, Rich
- Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective T… Bron Gondwana
- Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective T… Eliot Lear
- Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective T… Salz, Rich
- Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective T… Jim Fenton
- Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective T… Bron Gondwana
- Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective T… Salz, Rich
- Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective T… Bron Gondwana
- Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective T… Nico Williams
- Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective T… Nico Williams
- Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're fa… John Levine
- Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective T… Christian Huitema
- Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're fa… Stephen Farrell
- Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective T… Victor Kuarsingh
- Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective T… Livingood, Jason
- Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're fa… Dan Harkins
- Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective T… Nico Williams
- Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective T… Colin Perkins
- Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're fa… Marc Petit-Huguenin
- Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're fa… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're fa… Marc Petit-Huguenin
- Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're fa… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective T… Masataka Ohta
- Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective T… Masataka Ohta
- RE: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective T… Vasilenko Eduard
- Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective T… tom petch
- Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're fa… Marc Petit-Huguenin
- Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're fa… Salz, Rich
- Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're fa… Marc Petit-Huguenin
- Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're fa… John R Levine
- Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're fa… Theodore Ts'o
- Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're fa… Salz, Rich
- Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're fa… Marc Petit-Huguenin
- motivation to "join" IETF (was: the old fellowshi… Keith Moore
- Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're fa… Leif Johansson
- Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're fa… Warren Kumari
- RE: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're fa… Michael McBride
- Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're fa… Salz, Rich
- Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're fa… Michael Thomas
- Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're fa… Keith Moore
- Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're fa… Wes Hardaker
- Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're fa… Michael Thomas
- Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're fa… Michael Thomas
- Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're fa… Keith Moore
- Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're fa… Michael Thomas
- Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're fa… Keith Moore
- Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're fa… scott
- Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're fa… Michael Thomas
- Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're fa… Michael Thomas
- Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're fa… Keith Moore
- New-comers (was Re: the old fellowship program) Andrew Sullivan
- Re: New-comers (was Re: the old fellowship progra… John C Klensin
- Re: New-comers (was Re: the old fellowship progra… Ole Jacobsen
- Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're fa… Fernando Gont
- Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're fa… Fernando Gont
- Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're fa… Fernando Gont
- Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're fa… Fernando Gont
- Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective T… Fernando Gont
- Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're fa… Brian Carpenter
- Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective T… S Moonesamy
- Re: motivation to "join" IETF (was: the old fello… Lars Eggert
- Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're fa… tom petch
- RE: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective T… Vasilenko Eduard
- Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective T… JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're fa… Marc Petit-Huguenin
- Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective T… Ofer Inbar
- Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're fa… Salz, Rich
- Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're fa… Warren Kumari
- Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective T… Mary B
- RE: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're fa… STARK, BARBARA H
- Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're fa… Marc Petit-Huguenin
- Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're fa… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: New-comers (was Re: the old fellowship progra… John C Klensin
- Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective T… S Moonesamy
- Re: New-comers (was Re: the old fellowship progra… Michael Thomas
- RE: New-comers (was Re: the old fellowship progra… Larry Masinter
- Re: New-comers (was Re: the old fellowship progra… John C Klensin
- RE: New-comers (was Re: the old fellowship progra… Larry Masinter
- Re: New-comers (was Re: the old fellowship progra… Michael Thomas
- Re: New-comers (was Re: the old fellowship progra… Michael Richardson
- Re: New-comers (was Re: the old fellowship progra… Michael Thomas
- What's the alternative to "snarling"? (was: New-c… Keith Moore
- Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective T… Bron Gondwana
- Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective T… Bron Gondwana
- Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"? (was: N… lloyd.wood@yahoo.co.uk
- Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"? (was: N… Keith Moore
- Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective T… Ofer Inbar
- Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective T… Masataka Ohta
- Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective T… Masataka Ohta
- Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective T… Keith Moore
- Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"? Leif Johansson
- Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective T… Victor Kuarsingh
- Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"? (was: N… Leif Johansson
- Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective T… Masataka Ohta
- Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"? Keith Moore
- Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"? Marc Petit-Huguenin
- Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"? Keith Moore
- Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"? Leif Johansson
- Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"? Leif Johansson
- Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective T… Keith Moore
- Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"? Keith Moore
- Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"? Dave Cridland
- Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"? Christian Huitema
- Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"? Salz, Rich
- Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"? Keith Moore
- Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"? Keith Moore
- Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"? Clint Chaplin
- Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"? Salz, Rich
- Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"? Randy Presuhn
- Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"? Keith Moore
- Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"? Michael Thomas
- Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"? Keith Moore
- Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"? Leif Johansson
- Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"? Michael Thomas
- Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective T… Ofer Inbar
- Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"? Randy Presuhn
- Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"? Keith Moore
- Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"? Michael Thomas
- Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"? Richard Shockey
- adapting IETF in light of github and similar tool… Keith Moore
- RE: What's the alternative to "snarling"? Larry Masinter
- Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"? Richard Shockey
- Re: adapting IETF in light of github and similar … Brian E Carpenter
- Re: adapting IETF in light of github and similar … Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"? Leif Johansson
- Re: adapting IETF in light of github and similar … Lloyd W
- Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"? Dave Cridland
- Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"? Bron Gondwana
- Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"? Lloyd W
- Re: adapting IETF in light of github and similar … Keith Moore
- Re: adapting IETF in light of github and similar … John Levine
- Re: adapting IETF in light of github and similar … Salz, Rich
- Re: adapting IETF in light of github and similar … Nick Hilliard
- Re: adapting IETF in light of github and similar … Keith Moore
- Re: adapting IETF in light of github and similar … Eliot Lear
- RE: adapting IETF in light of github and similar … Larry Masinter
- Re: adapting IETF in light of github and similar … Fred Baker
- Re: adapting IETF in light of github and similar … Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"? Jay Daley
- Re: adapting IETF in light of github and similar … Jay Daley
- Re: adapting IETF in light of github and similar … Lloyd W
- Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"? Bron Gondwana
- Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"? Jay Daley
- Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"? Bron Gondwana
- Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"? Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"? Brian E Carpenter
- Re: adapting IETF in light of github and similar … Martin J. Dürst
- Re: adapting IETF in light of github and similar … Nick Hilliard