IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: not really to do with Re: WG Review: Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting & Conformance (dmarc)

"John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> Tue, 15 July 2014 19:49 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 529501A004D for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Jul 2014 12:49:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.137
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.137 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, HOST_MISMATCH_NET=0.311, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id A9km0zAhVaV7 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Jul 2014 12:49:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from miucha.iecc.com (abusenet-1-pt.tunnel.tserv4.nyc4.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f06:1126::2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3CB591A0027 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Jul 2014 12:49:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 32581 invoked from network); 15 Jul 2014 19:49:27 -0000
Received: from miucha.iecc.com (64.57.183.18) by mail1.iecc.com with QMQP; 15 Jul 2014 19:49:27 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=1315c.53c585c7.k1407; i=johnl@user.iecc.com; bh=V7GZ2/blh1rZ6TAMefHPRepfoj1ejKX5tZ/TPOwVpcs=; b=DCi5KajEnx198PqkSnaprcHUacqjx8HqQ/wI2s3XEk0eSYcC4Njk0/NoJyGAJSTXLO2B71+Yu/IuMU/LNdjHpcuNycQbT0zau1KIU+AQPvhp5u/3WPSpp/CT1LN+E6FGu+ToG03pUGaiOGZIALI7rzLCpnafQbU94QnGtbvNlYBYRgouDW9ZkbZw8681aJ6aoeVXE96GljcI8nxu/THc5uB2M4TIn9M4pi6hc40MWxwr78dFEoajZu1Kf9xTT5w8
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=1315c.53c585c7.k1407; olt=johnl@user.iecc.com; bh=V7GZ2/blh1rZ6TAMefHPRepfoj1ejKX5tZ/TPOwVpcs=; b=h+YGtGFAtOLnVCMu1OeRiwFeIW79jlnaSmNI90qeVmlIlS+FakZhIczaaDhZawx7V74yftH9v85W6q8ATW7jc8RH2F5KlE3h6cMYRs2iT2Im5P1tT7Zp4bS9WYbxBjddrqyKmgNoCDe5IOGXCAMJ5qX7arl/3ggQmxaVEXHQlxmptbGGtaYM/SG5bJ6f52tflyrwgTLPgmXocUvtl+hcDKpl8I2+wLQ2BQWtRASuRECPAX+ZxmTAIfMfWUcwK3cG
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2014 19:49:05 -0000
Message-ID: <20140715194905.78171.qmail@joyce.lan>
From: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: not really to do with Re: WG Review: Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting & Conformance (dmarc)
In-Reply-To: <4ebe347fd8454c39930b614585a968d6@BLUPR03MB424.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
Organization:
X-Headerized: yes
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/ZFP2J9MMH3Ka4FNAvCtFctYsZi4
Cc: huitema@microsoft.com
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2014 19:49:30 -0000

>Of course people will suggest that we validate the personal name information. Because at the end of the
>day, spoofing is trying to make me believe that the message comes from "my friend Viktor" when in fact it
>does not. We may have perfect SPF, DKIM, DMARC and what have you, and still get spoofed messages "From:
>Viktor Dukhovni <viktor@dukhovni.throwawaydomain.biz>." 

You know, that's what S/MIME with signed certificates is supposed to
do.  It's widely supported in MUAs and, well, meh.

R's,
John

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email