Re: IAOC requesting input on (potential) meeting cities

Behcet Sarikaya <sarikaya2012@gmail.com> Mon, 03 April 2017 18:44 UTC

Return-Path: <sarikaya2012@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EECC1294E6 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Apr 2017 11:44:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.749
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.749 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Gb2kib3l02Vn for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Apr 2017 11:44:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wr0-x22f.google.com (mail-wr0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c0c::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 06E431294D4 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 Apr 2017 11:44:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wr0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id w11so180749471wrc.3 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 03 Apr 2017 11:44:26 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=izOrvwIx3eXwRl32KkGj9OH3Ah51GPGHUCW2npfQGKg=; b=iYa6aiLzAlQIlQfBs6OLxpvA6fTWTn73G1UBxdfxgazPH2SP1IEuaqpSO3tT0p9NGI gDCULRkVGfvY+1+bYv0nV0Inh3iV75zuzKim1EvOkroUSBFydpQU+o1bLINI6qr/JEzG T/6t9MFEp7bue+1VU1MQZ1s9nFKJ/BDpLjhiaDG89wvYViXQellFCDlqtqDlaJPHW859 V4d04TUc9r45ay1UF/TeeqJAM3HcAuCCvBtOOzFuPe9+RFyE/R6T41XtDx6FqmwQC7VQ jMCnM96lZ1RaaIh5ykRWrpx0/q00iBk92+lwlMN7KDhDu5MihNtEKVn+V92Sa6qTcD9j h2DA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references :from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=izOrvwIx3eXwRl32KkGj9OH3Ah51GPGHUCW2npfQGKg=; b=eCIpVNXr7OqVZZVYMwCs4CYpvHCV/dIPICfnex5eOnk3XM6/XxmWSusYgxYS9R7X3Z s33CCLGy/FF5wuNkz0bJoYmPM8nkW/WHkK19B2xfWe665mqQMgv73yem1+g66DLkOiIb cKMvT6tlA396qp19BSNt2MJFZFLhugNGvJJBIqF/YfozdyVP4lHLondg78V6v9hE0SCC Ot+V6dbDv7+IzfFAsrZd2z7dBKeUyqqjwMqNQodC2kWD8vZEz8Zwkpei5to+JR222258 DYjWzdlsLofcaafom0LzUmDPJwhuRJ3fTj6kEMkljv+4LxzJ+dXpInkr//EuUfcoEL8D 7rLg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H2oLP+uGoEtkVFh1XzbmVu5jPoOsKzZQf/cfw39jHoS3jp6X5TSb+3Z1yQr3X5K9OqzLa6vQf28y7MHOQ==
X-Received: by 10.223.162.198 with SMTP id t6mr17689706wra.155.1491245065540; Mon, 03 Apr 2017 11:44:25 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.223.169.228 with HTTP; Mon, 3 Apr 2017 11:44:24 -0700 (PDT)
Reply-To: sarikaya@ieee.org
In-Reply-To: <93404c29-78ba-ff9b-9170-f5f2a5389a31@gmail.com>
References: <149096990336.4276.3480662759931758139.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <9fee9874-1306-07a2-a84a-4e09381a5336@cisco.com> <E67FDB14-9895-48E0-A334-167172D322DB@nohats.ca> <20170403152624.GA11714@gsp.org> <93404c29-78ba-ff9b-9170-f5f2a5389a31@gmail.com>
From: Behcet Sarikaya <sarikaya2012@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 03 Apr 2017 13:44:24 -0500
Message-ID: <CAC8QAccNXCQivK7J7r8k0ZAOCmFPoi42orEDTrFpo1vbjTvmPQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: IAOC requesting input on (potential) meeting cities
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Cc: IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="f403045e9cf6679b0a054c478c03"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/ZFTgyE8y-j24fou-V5dTyeHo8XM>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Apr 2017 18:44:29 -0000

On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 11:23 AM, Brian E Carpenter <
brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 04/04/2017 03:26, Rich Kulawiec wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 11:59:49AM -0500, Paul Wouters wrote:
> >> I don't know when I will be refused entry for not handing out
> >> passwords or pins.
> ...
> > Moreover, the ad hoc policies that are in place are used very
> > inconsistently -- at the personal whims of those enforcing them --
> > and are subject to change not only without advance notice,
> > but without any notice of any kind.
> >
> > Because of this, asking anyone to come to the US at this time is
> > equivalent to asking them to incur unknown but possibly very large
> > privacy and security risks, as well the financial risk of losing
> > any/all computing devices they bring with them.
>
> What is specific to the US in all that? Afaik, customs or immigration
> officers have similar rights in many, if not most, countries. And they
> use them from time to time, at random or as a result of profiling.
>
> Before you formally enter the country, your rights are limited
> in most cases, not only in the US.
>

+1

Behcet

>
>     Brian
>
>